The Samsung Galaxy M12 (India) and Oppo F19s represent compelling options in the fiercely competitive sub-₹15,000 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price, they diverge significantly in their core hardware – specifically, their chipsets and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best overall value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more responsive experience, the Oppo F19s emerges as the winner. Its 33W charging significantly outperforms the M12’s 15W, and the Snapdragon 662, despite being on an 11nm process, offers a noticeable edge in everyday tasks and light gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 05 | 2021, September 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 18 | Available. Released 2021, September 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.9 x 9.7 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 in) | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 221 g (7.80 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, One UI 3.1 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Attractive Black, Elegant Blue, Trendy Emerald Green | Glowing Black, Glowing Gold |
| Models | SM-M127F, SM-M127F/DS, SM-F127G, SM-F127G/DS, SM-M127G, SM-M127G/DS | CPH2219, CPH2223 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.54 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) | - |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | ₹ 13,999 | - |
Samsung Galaxy M12 (India)
- Potentially better power efficiency due to 8nm Exynos 850.
- Likely larger display for immersive media consumption.
- Samsung’s established brand reputation.
- Significantly slower 15W charging.
- Less powerful chipset for multitasking and gaming.
- Potentially less responsive user experience.
Oppo F19s
- Faster 33W charging for reduced downtime.
- More responsive performance with Snapdragon 662.
- Better GPU performance for casual gaming.
- Less power-efficient 11nm Snapdragon 662.
- Potentially smaller display size.
- Oppo’s software experience may not appeal to all users.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The focus here isn't on cutting-edge tech, but on usability. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are missing, the M12’s larger size (implied by its overall dimensions) may offer a more immersive viewing experience for media consumption. However, without knowing the peak brightness of either display, it’s difficult to assess outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, with both phones targeting the budget segment. The absence of detailed camera specs suggests neither will excel in low-light conditions. While both may include a multi-camera setup, the usefulness of 2MP macro or depth sensors is questionable. The primary sensor’s quality and image processing algorithms will be the deciding factors, and without further information, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner. Expect decent daylight photos but limited dynamic range and detail in challenging lighting.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy M12 utilizes the Exynos 850 (8nm), while the Oppo F19s features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 8nm process of the Exynos 850 *should* theoretically offer better power efficiency. However, the Snapdragon 662’s Kryo 260 Gold cores, clocked at 2.0 GHz, provide a performance advantage over the Cortex-A55 cores in the Exynos 850, despite the larger node size. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking on the Oppo F19s. Both phones have 6GB of RAM, mitigating some performance differences, but the chipset remains the key differentiator. The Snapdragon 662 is also known for better GPU performance, making it a slightly better choice for casual gamers.
Battery Life
The Oppo F19s’ 33W charging is a significant advantage. It’s claimed to reach 54% charge in 30 minutes, drastically reducing downtime compared to the Samsung Galaxy M12’s 15W charging. While the M12 may have a slightly larger battery capacity (spec not provided, but typical for Samsung M-series), the faster charging of the F19s effectively mitigates any potential battery life difference for most users. The convenience of quickly topping up the battery outweighs a potentially marginal increase in overall runtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy M12 (India) if you prioritize a larger display and are comfortable with slower charging speeds, and your usage primarily revolves around basic tasks like calling, messaging, and social media. Buy the Oppo F19s if you value faster charging, a more responsive user interface, and a chipset better suited for occasional gaming or multitasking, even if it means a slightly less efficient manufacturing process.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 850 in the Samsung Galaxy M12 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 850 is generally a thermally efficient chip, but its performance is limited. While it won't likely overheat dramatically, you may experience noticeable frame drops and throttling during extended gaming sessions, especially with graphically demanding titles. The Snapdragon 662 in the Oppo F19s, while less efficient, manages heat slightly better due to its more capable GPU.
❓ Is the 54% charge in 30 minutes claim for the Oppo F19s accurate in real-world usage?
The 54% in 30 minutes claim is based on Oppo’s testing conditions. Real-world results may vary depending on factors like ambient temperature and battery health. However, even if it’s slightly lower, the 33W charging is still significantly faster than the Samsung Galaxy M12’s 15W charging, offering a substantial time saving.
❓ Are the 2MP macro and depth cameras on either phone worth considering?
Generally, no. 2MP macro cameras typically produce low-resolution images with limited detail. Depth sensors can assist with portrait mode effects, but software processing has largely replaced the need for dedicated depth sensors. Don't base your purchasing decision on these cameras.
❓ Which phone is better for playing PUBG Mobile?
The Oppo F19s is the better choice for PUBG Mobile. The Snapdragon 662’s GPU provides a smoother gaming experience, even at medium settings. While both phones can run the game, the M12’s Exynos 850 may struggle to maintain consistent frame rates, especially in intense firefights.
