The Samsung Galaxy M07 and Xiaomi Redmi 10A represent two of the most competitive segments in the smartphone market: ultra-budget devices. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The M07 leverages a newer, more efficient chipset, while the Redmi 10A focuses on minimizing costs. This comparison will dissect the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the Samsung Galaxy M07 is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Helio G99 chipset offers significantly better performance than the Redmi 10A’s Helio G25, and the 25W charging is a substantial advantage. While the Redmi 10A is cheaper, the performance trade-offs are too significant for most.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 01 | 2022, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 01 | Available. Released 2022, March 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 77.4 x 7.6 mm (6.59 x 3.05 x 0.30 in) | 164.9 x 77.1 x 9 mm (6.49 x 3.04 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Charcoal Black, Sea Blue, Slate Grey |
| Models | SM-M075F/DS, SM-M075F | 220233L2C, 220233L2G, 220233L2I |
| Price | ₹ 6,799 | € 60.00 / $ 66.55 |
| SAR | 0.24 W/kg (head) | 0.90 W/kg (head) 0.65 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.40 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy M07
- Significantly faster processor (Helio G99)
- Faster 25W charging
- More efficient 6nm chipset
- Better multitasking capabilities
- Potentially higher price
- May not have a significantly better camera
Xiaomi Redmi 10A
- Lower price point
- Functional for basic tasks
- Acceptable battery life for light usage
- Simple and easy-to-use interface
- Slow processor (Helio G25)
- Slow 10W charging
- Struggles with multitasking and demanding apps
- Less future-proof
Display Comparison
Neither Samsung nor Xiaomi provide display specifications beyond resolution in the provided data. However, given the price points, both likely utilize LCD panels. The real difference lies in the processing power needed to drive them, which the M07’s G99 handles more efficiently. Expect similar viewing experiences in direct sunlight, but the G99’s GPU will provide smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely feature similar budget camera setups. The processing power of the G99 in the M07 will likely result in slightly better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions, due to its more capable ISP (Image Signal Processor). Expect similar results from the main sensors, but the M07 will likely handle HDR and noise reduction more effectively.
Performance
The core difference between these two phones is the chipset. The Samsung Galaxy M07’s Mediatek Helio G99, built on a 6nm process, is a substantial upgrade over the Xiaomi Redmi 10A’s Helio G25 (12nm). The G99’s CPU features two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz alongside six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, offering significantly better single-core and multi-core performance compared to the G25’s four Cortex-A53 cores at 2.0 GHz and four at 1.5 GHz. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the M07. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained use. The G25, while adequate for basic tasks, will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn’t specified, the M07’s 25W wired charging is a major advantage over the Redmi 10A’s 10W charging. This means the M07 can be significantly topped up in a shorter amount of time, even if the battery capacity is similar. The G99’s improved power efficiency also contributes to potentially longer battery life, as it consumes less power during everyday tasks. The Redmi 10A will require considerably more time to reach a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy M07 if you need a phone that can handle multitasking, moderate gaming, and benefits from faster charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who want a smoother experience and anticipate keeping their phone for more than a year. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 10A if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and you are on an extremely tight budget. It’s a functional device for those who prioritize affordability above all else.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G99 in the Samsung Galaxy M07 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Helio G99 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with acceptable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship gaming experience, it provides a playable experience that the Helio G25 in the Redmi 10A would struggle to achieve consistently.
❓ How much faster is the 25W charging on the Samsung Galaxy M07 compared to the 10W charging on the Redmi 10A?
The 25W charging on the M07 will significantly reduce charging times. While exact 0-100% times depend on battery capacity, expect the M07 to charge roughly 60-80% faster than the Redmi 10A. This means less time tethered to a charger and more time using your phone.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Absolutely. The Helio G99’s more powerful CPU and GPU will result in smoother scrolling, faster app loading times, and a more responsive overall experience when browsing the web, using social media, and switching between apps. The Redmi 10A’s Helio G25 may exhibit noticeable lag in these scenarios.
