The Samsung Galaxy M07 and Motorola Moto G13 represent compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone space. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in their chipset choices. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on how the Mediatek Helio G99 in the M07 stacks up against the Helio G85 powering the Moto G13.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy M07 emerges as the stronger choice. Its newer Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage and better thermal management compared to the Moto G13’s 12nm Helio G85. While the Moto G13 offers a slightly cleaner software experience, the M07’s superior processing power justifies the potential software overhead.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 01 | 2023, January 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 01 | Available. Released 2023, January 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 77.4 x 7.6 mm (6.59 x 3.05 x 0.30 in) | 162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2 mm (6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 183.5 g (6.49 oz) |
| | - | Water-resistant design |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 20W or 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Matte Charcoal, Blue Lavender, Rose Gold |
| Models | SM-M075F/DS, SM-M075F | - |
| Price | ₹ 6,799 | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | 0.24 W/kg (head) | - |
Samsung Galaxy M07
- Superior processing power with the Helio G99
- Faster 25W wired charging
- More efficient 6nm fabrication process
- Potential for more software bloat from Samsung
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load
Motorola Moto G13
- Cleaner, near-stock Android experience
- Potentially slightly better standby battery life
- More affordable price point (potentially)
- Less powerful Helio G85 chipset
- Slower charging speeds (20W or 10W)
- Less efficient 12nm fabrication process
Display Comparison
Neither Samsung nor Motorola provide detailed display specifications beyond resolution. However, given the market segment, both likely utilize LCD panels. The key difference lies in the underlying processing power to drive them. The Helio G99 in the M07 has a more capable GPU, potentially enabling smoother animations and better graphics rendering, even if the panels themselves are similar. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this price range. Color accuracy is unlikely to be a standout feature on either device.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are absent, but both phones likely feature a primary camera alongside depth and macro sensors. The M07’s Helio G99 includes a more advanced image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to better image processing, dynamic range, and low-light performance. The G85’s ISP is adequate for basic photography, but will struggle in challenging conditions. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing gimmick and should not be a deciding factor. The aperture and sensor size of the main camera are critical, but unavailable in the provided data.
Performance
The core differentiator is the chipset. The Samsung Galaxy M07’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture than the Motorola Moto G13’s Helio G85 (12nm). The G99’s CPU features two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, offering a significant uplift in single-core performance compared to the G85’s 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. The 6nm fabrication process also contributes to improved power efficiency, meaning less throttling under sustained load. This translates to a smoother experience in demanding games and applications. While both phones feature 4GB or 6GB of RAM (likely LPDDR4X in both cases, given the price point), the G99’s superior processing power will maximize its effectiveness.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified, but both phones likely fall in the 5000mAh range, typical for this segment. The M07’s 25W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Moto G13’s 20W or 10W options. The faster charging will significantly reduce the time required to replenish the battery, offering greater convenience. While the G85’s 12nm process *could* theoretically offer slightly better standby battery life, the G99’s efficiency gains under load likely offset this advantage during typical usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy M07 if you prioritize performance for gaming, multitasking, or demanding applications and are willing to accept potentially more software bloat. Buy the Motorola Moto G13 if you value a streamlined Android experience and prioritize battery life over raw processing power, and your usage is primarily focused on basic communication and light social media.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G99 in the Galaxy M07 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Helio G99 is significantly more capable than the Helio G85. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it should handle PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The 6nm process will also help mitigate throttling during extended gaming sessions, providing a more consistent experience.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto G13 support software updates beyond the initial Android release?
Motorola’s update track record is generally less consistent than Samsung’s. While the Moto G13 will likely receive at least one major Android update, long-term software support is less guaranteed compared to the Galaxy M07, which is more likely to receive security patches and potentially a second major Android version.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 25W and 20W/10W really noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the difference is substantial. 25W charging can typically take a phone from 0% to 50% in around 30-40 minutes, while 20W or 10W charging can take over an hour and a half. This faster charging is particularly beneficial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
