The Samsung Galaxy M07 and Motorola Moto E13 represent two distinct approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The M07, leveraging the Mediatek Helio G99, aims for a performance edge, while the Moto E13 focuses on delivering a basic Android experience at the lowest possible price point with the Unisoc T606. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and faster charging, the Samsung Galaxy M07 is the clear winner. Its Helio G99 chipset offers a significant performance uplift over the Moto E13’s Unisoc T606, making it better suited for gaming and demanding apps. However, the Moto E13 remains a viable option for those seeking a simple, affordable phone for basic tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 01 | 2023, January 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 01 | Available. Released 2023, February 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 77.4 x 7.6 mm (6.59 x 3.05 x 0.30 in) | 164.2 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 179.5 g (6.35 oz) |
| | - | Water-resistant design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 13 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black | Cosmic Black, Creamy White, Aurora Green |
| Models | SM-M075F/DS, SM-M075F | - |
| Price | ₹ 6,799 | $ 119.99 / € 104.99 |
| SAR | 0.24 W/kg (head) | - |
Samsung Galaxy M07
- Significantly faster processor (Helio G99)
- Faster 25W charging
- More efficient 6nm chipset
- Potentially higher price point
- May have more bloatware
Motorola Moto E13
- Extremely affordable
- Clean Android experience (typically)
- Simple and easy to use
- Slow processor (Unisoc T606)
- Slow 10W charging
- Limited performance for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing, the focus here is on the underlying chipset's ability to drive the display smoothly. The M07’s Helio G99, built on a 6nm process, is more efficient and capable of handling higher refresh rates (if the display supported it) than the Moto E13’s 12nm Unisoc T606. This translates to potentially smoother animations and a more responsive user experience on the M07, even if both displays are 720p.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market positioning suggests the M07 likely features a more capable primary sensor. Both phones likely include a 2MP macro lens, which offers limited practical benefit due to its low resolution. The Helio G99’s image signal processor (ISP) is also more advanced, potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance on the M07. Expect the M07 to deliver more detailed and vibrant photos.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Mediatek Helio G99 in the Galaxy M07, with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, offers substantially more processing power than the Motorola Moto E13’s Unisoc T606, which tops out at 1.6 GHz with Cortex-A75 cores. The 6nm fabrication process of the G99 further enhances efficiency and sustained performance, reducing thermal throttling during extended use. This means the M07 will handle graphically intensive games and multitasking with greater ease. The Unisoc T606 is adequate for basic tasks, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn't specified, the charging speeds reveal a key difference. The Samsung Galaxy M07’s 25W wired charging is significantly faster than the Motorola Moto E13’s 10W charging. This means the M07 can replenish its battery much quicker, minimizing downtime. Even if the Moto E13 has a slightly larger battery, the M07’s faster charging will likely result in a more convenient user experience. The more efficient Helio G99 may also contribute to better overall battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy M07 if you need a phone capable of handling moderate gaming, multitasking, and appreciate faster 25W charging. This is the choice for users who want a bit more future-proofing. Buy the Motorola Moto E13 if you prioritize extreme affordability and only require a phone for calls, texts, and light social media use. It’s a no-frills option for those on a very tight budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T606 in the Moto E13 struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
While the Unisoc T606 can handle basic apps like WhatsApp and Facebook, expect some lag and slower loading times, especially with multiple apps open simultaneously. It's designed for light usage, and heavy multitasking will likely result in a frustrating experience.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Samsung Galaxy M07 with the 25W charger?
With the included 25W charger, the Samsung Galaxy M07 should charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes to 2 hours, depending on usage during charging. This is a significant improvement over the Moto E13’s much slower 10W charging.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy M07 a good choice for playing mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty?
The Helio G99 in the Galaxy M07 is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a playable frame rate. Don't expect a flagship-level gaming experience, but it's significantly better than what the Moto E13 can offer.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto E13 receive regular software updates and security patches?
Motorola's update schedule for the Moto E13 is typically limited. While it will likely receive a few security patches, major Android version updates are unlikely. Samsung generally provides more consistent software support, even for its budget devices.
