Looking for an affordable Samsung smartphone? The Galaxy M04 and F13 are both contenders, offering a blend of features and value. But which one is the better choice for your needs? This detailed comparison will break down everything you need to know.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy F13 takes the crown. While the M04 is a decent entry-level option, the F13's Exynos 850 chipset provides significantly better performance and efficiency, making it the more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 10 | 2022, June 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 16 | Available. Released 2022, June 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 9.3 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Exynos 850 (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 |
| OS | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI Core 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sea Glass Green, Shadow Blue | Waterfall Blue, Sunrise Copper, Nightsky Green |
| Models | SM-M045F, SM-M045F/DS | SM-E135F, SM-E135F/DS |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | 0.38 W/kg (head) | 0.55 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | 0.29 W/kg (head) 1.11 W/kg (body) | 0.45 W/kg (head) 1.36 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy M04
- More compact size
- Affordable price
- Large battery
- Slow performance
- Basic camera
- Outdated chipset
Samsung Galaxy F13
- Better performance
- Larger display
- Efficient chipset
- Good battery life
- Slightly larger size
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Galaxy F13 boasts a larger 6.6-inch display compared to the M04's 6.5-inch screen. Both feature an FHD+ resolution, but the F13's larger size offers a more immersive viewing experience. Expect similar color accuracy and brightness on both.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a triple-camera setup, likely with a 50MP main sensor. However, the F13's more powerful processor allows for better image processing and potentially improved low-light performance. Expect similar camera features like portrait mode and panorama.
Performance
This is where the F13 shines. The Exynos 850 is a considerably more powerful chipset than the Helio P35. Expect smoother app loading, better multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the F13. The M04 will feel noticeably slower, especially with demanding apps.
Battery Life
Both devices offer a large 6000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life. However, the F13's more efficient Exynos chipset will likely result in slightly better real-world battery performance.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy M04 is ideal for users on the tightest budget who prioritize basic functionality and a smaller form factor. The Samsung Galaxy F13 is a better fit for those who want a smoother experience, improved performance for multitasking and gaming, and a larger display.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy M04 good for gaming?
The M04's Helio P35 chipset is not ideal for demanding games. You'll likely experience lag and low frame rates. The F13 is a better choice for casual gaming.
❓ Which Samsung phone has better software support?
Both phones will receive similar software updates from Samsung, but the F13's newer chipset might allow it to stay updated for a slightly longer period.
