Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Samsung Galaxy M04 and Realme Narzo N53 are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one reigns supreme? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme Narzo N53 takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging (33W vs 15W), a more powerful chipset, and generally better performance. While the M04 offers Samsung's brand recognition, the Narzo N53 provides a more compelling overall package for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 10 | 2023, May 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 16 | Available. Released 2023, May 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 167.3 x 76.7 x 7.5 mm (6.59 x 3.02 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 |
| OS | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 | Android 13, Realme UI T |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 33W wired, 50% in 31 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sea Glass Green, Shadow Blue | Black, Gold |
| Models | SM-M045F, SM-M045F/DS | RMX3761 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | 0.38 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.29 W/kg (head) 1.11 W/kg (body) | - |
Samsung Galaxy M04
- Samsung Brand Recognition
- Familiar One UI
- Decent Battery Life (5000mAh)
- Slow 15W Charging
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Potentially Lower Display Brightness
Realme Narzo N53
- Faster 33W Charging
- More Powerful Chipset (Unisoc T612)
- Potentially Better Camera Processing
- Modern Design
- Realme Brand (less established than Samsung)
- May have some pre-installed bloatware
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar LCD displays, probably around 6.5 inches with HD+ resolution. Expect decent viewing angles but limited color accuracy. The Narzo N53 might have a slightly brighter display, but this is speculative without official data. Brightness and color accuracy are key areas to consider if you consume a lot of media.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely similar, with both phones featuring a primary camera around 50MP and potentially a depth sensor. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing. Realme often excels in computational photography, so the Narzo N53 might produce slightly better images in challenging lighting conditions. Low-light performance is likely to be a weak point on both devices.
Performance
The Realme Narzo N53's Unisoc Tiger T612 with its Cortex-A75 cores offers a noticeable performance advantage over the M04's Helio P35. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a better gaming experience on the Narzo N53. The M04 will handle basic tasks adequately, but may struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a battery capacity around 5000mAh. However, the Realme Narzo N53's 33W fast charging is a game-changer, allowing for a 50% charge in just 31 minutes. The M04's 15W charging will take considerably longer to reach a full charge.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy M04 is a good choice for users deeply invested in the Samsung ecosystem and prioritizing a familiar UI. The Realme Narzo N53 is ideal for those seeking better performance, faster charging, and a more modern chipset without spending a fortune.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Realme Narzo N53's Unisoc Tiger T612 chipset provides significantly better gaming performance compared to the Samsung Galaxy M04's Helio P35.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
The Realme Narzo N53 takes approximately 1 hour 15 minutes to fully charge with its 33W charger, while the Samsung Galaxy M04 takes around 2 hours 30 minutes with its 15W charger.