Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Samsung Galaxy M04 and Motorola Moto E13 are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best value for your money? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy M04 edges out the Moto E13 thanks to its slightly faster chipset and quicker charging. However, the Moto E13 might offer a cleaner Android experience and potentially better software support. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your priorities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 10 | 2023, January 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 16 | Available. Released 2023, February 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 164.2 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 179.5 g (6.35 oz) |
| | - | Water-resistant design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 | Android 13 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sea Glass Green, Shadow Blue | Cosmic Black, Creamy White, Aurora Green |
| Models | SM-M045F, SM-M045F/DS | - |
| Price | About 100 EUR | $ 119.99 / € 104.99 |
| SAR | 0.38 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.29 W/kg (head) 1.11 W/kg (body) | - |
Samsung Galaxy M04
- Slightly faster chipset
- 15W charging
- Potential for better color accuracy on display
- Dual camera setup (depth sensor)
- Software updates may be less frequent
- Design can feel a bit dated
Motorola Moto E13
- Clean Android experience
- Potentially longer software support
- 5000mAh battery for all-day use
- More affordable
- Slower chipset
- 10W charging
- Single camera setup
- Display quality is adequate but not exceptional
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.6-inch HD+ display, offering decent viewing angles for everyday use. However, the Samsung might have slightly better color accuracy. The Moto E13's display is generally considered adequate for its price point.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy M04 typically features a dual-camera setup (13MP main + 2MP depth), while the Moto E13 usually has a single 13MP main camera. Image quality is comparable in good lighting conditions, but both struggle in low light. The M04's depth sensor might offer slightly better portrait mode results.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy M04's Mediatek Helio P35 generally outperforms the Unisoc T606 in the Moto E13, especially in multitasking and light gaming. While neither phone is a powerhouse, the M04 offers a smoother experience overall. Expect some lag on both devices with demanding apps.
Battery Life
The Moto E13 typically packs a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life for moderate users. The Galaxy M04 also has a large battery, but the 15W charging is slower than the Moto E13's 10W charging. Expect around 10-12 hours of screen-on time on both devices.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy M04 is ideal for users who prioritize a bit more processing power and faster charging. The Motorola Moto E13 is a good fit for those seeking a simple, clean Android experience and potentially longer software updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better performance?
The Samsung Galaxy M04 generally offers slightly better performance due to its Mediatek Helio P35 chipset.
❓ Which phone will get software updates for longer?
Motorola is often praised for providing quicker and more consistent software updates on their budget devices, so the Moto E13 might have an edge.
❓ Is the camera quality good on either of these phones?
Neither phone excels in camera quality, but both are adequate for casual photography in good lighting conditions.
