Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G vs. Motorola Razr+ 2025: A Deep Dive into Foldable Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and all-day battery life, the Motorola Razr+ 2025 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset, built on a 4nm process, offers a significant efficiency and power advantage over the Galaxy Fold 5G’s older Snapdragon 855.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G | Motorola Razr+ 2025 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 78 NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| EDGE | No | - |
| GPRS | Class 12 | - |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2019, February. Released 2019, September | 2025, April 24 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2025, June 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back, aluminum frame | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (titanium) |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 160.9 x 117.9 x 6.9 mm Folded: 160.9 x 62.9 x 15.5 mm | Unfolded: 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.3 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 276 g (9.74 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1536 x 2152 pixels (~362 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.3 inches, 162.6 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable Dynamic AMOLED, HDR10+ | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: Super AMOLED, 4.6 inches, 720 x 1680 pixels, 21:9 ratio | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 640 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4 | Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Call records | Yes | - |
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Phonebook | 1000 entries, Photocall | - |
| UFS 3.0 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 2 MP | - |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.5-2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, AF, OIS, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 4K@60fps, 1080p@60/240fps (gyro-EIS), 720p@960fps (gyro-EIS), HDR10 | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.22µm 8 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1.22µm, depth sensor Cover camera: 10 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.22µm | - |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML | - |
| Games | Downloadable | - |
| Java | Yes, MIDP 2.0 | - |
| Messaging | SMS, MMS, Email | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| ANT+ Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung DeX (desktop experience support) Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired 15W wireless 4.5W reverse wireless | 45W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 350 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 5 h | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4235 mAh, non-removable | 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Silver, Cosmos Black | Pantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | SM-F907F, SM-F9007, SM-F907W, SM-F907U, SM-F907B, SM-F907N | XT2451-1 |
| Price | About 1400 EUR | $ 500.00 |
| SAR | 0.41 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.49 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 90h | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 185000:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | Voice 70dB / Noise 73dB / Ring 90dB | - |
| Performance | Basemark OS II 2.0: 4527Basemark X: 45154 | - |
Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G
- Longer overall battery endurance (90h rating)
- High contrast ratio display (185000:1)
- Proven software support from Samsung
- Older Snapdragon 855 chipset
- Slower 15W wired charging
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
Motorola Razr+ 2025
- More efficient Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset (4nm)
- Faster 45W wired charging
- Modern foldable design
- Shorter active use battery life (10:12h)
- Display specs are unknown
- Motorola's software update track record is less consistent than Samsung's
Display Comparison
While both devices feature foldable displays, the provided data doesn't allow for a direct comparison of panel quality. However, the Galaxy Fold 5G boasts a remarkable 185000:1 contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Razr+ 2025’s display specs are absent, but Motorola typically focuses on color accuracy and brightness in its flagship devices. The Fold’s larger form factor likely translates to a more expansive viewing experience, while the Razr+’s clamshell design prioritizes portability. The absence of refresh rate data for both devices is a notable omission.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the focus should be on sensor size and image processing capabilities. Given the Razr+ 2025 is a newer device, it’s reasonable to expect advancements in image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensor sizes. The Fold 5G, while capable, will likely fall behind in low-light performance and dynamic range due to its older hardware. We can assume both devices will offer a range of shooting modes, but the Razr+ 2025 likely benefits from newer computational photography techniques.
Performance
The core performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Razr+ 2025’s Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) represents a substantial leap forward from the Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G’s SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7nm). The 4nm process node of the 8s Gen 3 delivers significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management, meaning less throttling during prolonged gaming or demanding applications. The Razr+ 2025’s CPU configuration – a Cortex-X4 prime core alongside A720 and A520 cores – is architecturally superior to the Kryo 485 cores in the Fold 5G, promising faster single-core and multi-core performance. The Fold 5G’s older chipset will likely struggle with newer, more demanding applications.
Battery Life
The battery situation presents a clear trade-off. The Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G has an endurance rating of 90 hours, indicating excellent longevity under moderate use. However, the Motorola Razr+ 2025 boasts a significantly faster charging speed of 45W wired, compared to the Fold 5G’s 15W. While the Razr+ 2025’s active use score of 10:12h is lower than the Fold’s endurance rating, the faster charging mitigates this difference, allowing for quicker top-ups. The Razr+ 2025 also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Fold 5G.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G if you prioritize a proven track record of software support and a larger, more immersive foldable display experience, and are willing to accept compromises in battery life and processing power. Buy the Motorola Razr+ 2025 if you value faster charging, a more efficient processor for demanding tasks, and a more compact, modern foldable design.