Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) vs Samsung Galaxy F62: A Detailed Performance and Charging Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) emerges as the superior choice. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, delivers comparable performance to the Exynos 9825 while benefiting from significantly faster 67W charging. The F62 remains a viable option for those prioritizing a larger display, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s overall package is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F62 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 15 | 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, February 22 | Available. Released 2021, June 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 420 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 & 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired 4.5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | SM-E625F, SM-E625F/DS | - |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 0.74 W/kg (head) | - |
Samsung Galaxy F62
- Potentially larger display for immersive media consumption.
- Reverse wireless charging for topping up accessories.
- Established Samsung brand reputation.
- Slower 25W charging.
- Less efficient 7nm Exynos 9825 chipset.
- Potentially lower sustained performance due to thermal throttling.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
- Significantly faster 67W charging.
- More efficient 6nm Dimensity 1100 chipset.
- Improved CPU architecture for better performance.
- Likely superior image processing capabilities.
- May have a smaller display compared to the F62.
- Brand recognition may be lower in some markets.
- Software experience may differ from Samsung's One UI.
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature LCD panels (specific panel details are missing), the focus shifts to size and efficiency. The Galaxy F62’s larger display is beneficial for multimedia, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s potentially higher brightness and more efficient chipset could translate to better outdoor visibility and battery life. The absence of high refresh rate information for both devices means smooth scrolling isn't a guaranteed feature.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s chipset likely offers superior image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction. The Exynos 9825 is a capable performer, but the Dimensity 1100’s newer ISP architecture provides an edge. Both phones likely feature multiple rear cameras, but the quality of the sensors and lenses will be the determining factor. We can assume both will have a standard wide, ultrawide, and depth sensor, but details on the main sensor resolution and aperture are crucial.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s Dimensity 1100, fabricated on a 6nm process, offers a clear architectural advantage over the Galaxy F62’s 7nm Exynos 9825. The Dimensity 1100’s Cortex-A78 cores provide a performance boost over the Exynos’ Cortex-A75 cores, particularly in sustained workloads. While the Exynos 9825 boasts a higher clock speed on its prime cores (2.73 GHz vs 2.6 GHz), the Dimensity 1100’s efficiency and modern architecture likely result in better thermal management and sustained performance during gaming. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s chipset also benefits from improved AI processing capabilities.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 67W charging is a game-changer. A full charge in just 42 minutes significantly reduces downtime compared to the Galaxy F62’s 25W charging. While the Galaxy F62 may have a slightly larger battery capacity (spec not provided), the Dimensity 1100’s efficiency means the Redmi Note 10 Pro will likely offer comparable, if not better, real-world battery life. The inclusion of reverse wired charging on the F62 is a niche feature, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s faster charging speeds are more universally beneficial.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F62 if you prioritize a larger screen real estate and are less concerned with charging speed. It’s a good option for media consumption and users who don’t mind slower top-ups. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you value faster performance, significantly quicker charging, and a more modern chipset architecture. This phone is ideal for gamers, power users, and anyone who wants a phone that can keep up with their demanding lifestyle.