Samsung Galaxy F62 vs. S20 FE 5G: Which Samsung Phone Delivers the Best Value?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balanced experience, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 865 chipset delivers smoother performance, the 822 nit display is significantly brighter, and the inclusion of wireless charging adds convenience. However, the F62 remains a compelling option for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life above all else.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F62 | Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66, 71 - USA |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 41, 66, 71 Sub6 - USA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat19 1800/200 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40, 41, 78 Sub6 - International | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 15 | 2020, September 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, February 22 | Available. Released 2020, October 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) | 159.8 x 74.5 x 8.4 mm (6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~407 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 101.0 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 420 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 & 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 2 MP |
| Triple | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.76", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 76mm (telephoto), 1/4.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio Tuned by AKG | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Browser | - | HTTP / WAP 2.0 |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing Bixby natural language commands and dictation Samsung Pay (Visa, MasterCard certified) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired 4.5W reverse wired | 25W wired, PD3.0 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 300 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 5 h |
| Type | Li-Po 7000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Cloud Lavender, Cloud Mint, Cloud Navy, Cloud White, Cloud Red, Cloud Orange |
| Models | SM-E625F, SM-E625F/DS | SM-G781B, SM-G781B/DS, SM-G781U, SM-G781U1, SM-G781W, SM-G7810, SM-G781N, SM-G781V |
| Price | About 270 EUR | $ 137.00 / C$ 531.23 / £ 169.00 / € 199.00 |
| SAR | 0.74 W/kg (head) | 0.70 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.50 W/kg (head) 1.35 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | - | $ 361.99 |
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | $ 589.97 |
| 256GB 8GB RAM | - | $ 769.99 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 110h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 543986 (v8) GeekBench: 3296 (v5.1) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy F62
- Potentially longer battery life (due to larger capacity, though unspecified)
- Lower price point makes it more accessible
- 25W fast charging is adequate
- Exynos 9825 chipset is less powerful than Snapdragon 865
- Display likely lacks the brightness and color accuracy of the S20 FE 5G
- Camera performance likely inferior to the S20 FE 5G
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G
- Snapdragon 865 delivers flagship-level performance
- 822 nit display offers excellent visibility
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging add convenience
- Higher price point
- Battery life, while good, may not exceed the F62’s (depending on capacity)
- Higher price for comparable storage options
Display Comparison
The S20 FE 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 822 nits, compared to the F62’s unspecified brightness. This makes the S20 FE 5G far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the S20 FE’s higher peak brightness and potentially better color calibration contribute to a more visually appealing experience. The S20 FE’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors, though without detailed panel specifications for the F62, a direct comparison is limited.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a 'Photo / Video' camera system, but details are sparse. The S20 FE 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s more advanced image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensor sizes, though specific sensor details are missing. The F62’s camera system is likely tuned for cost-effectiveness, potentially sacrificing some image quality in low-light conditions. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the F62 is unlikely to significantly enhance the photography experience, serving primarily as a marketing feature. The S20 FE’s OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is a key advantage for sharper photos and smoother videos.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The S20 FE 5G’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+) is a flagship-level processor, utilizing a 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 prime core and 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 performance cores. This architecture, built on a refined 7nm+ process, offers superior single-core and multi-core performance compared to the F62’s Exynos 9825 (7nm). The Exynos 9825, with its 2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 cores and 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75 cores, is still capable, but will likely exhibit more throttling under sustained load. The S20 FE’s LPDDR5 RAM (configurations vary) also contributes to faster data access and improved responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Galaxy F62’s strength is its battery endurance, though the exact capacity is not provided. The S20 FE 5G has an endurance rating of 110 hours, indicating excellent battery life. However, the F62’s 25W wired charging is matched by the S20 FE 5G, but the S20 FE adds the convenience of 15W wireless charging (Qi) and 4.5W reverse wireless charging. The S20 FE also supports PD3.0 for faster wired charging with compatible adapters. While the F62 offers 4.5W reverse *wired* charging, the S20 FE’s wireless reverse charging is more versatile.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F62 if you need exceptional battery life and don't mind a slightly less polished experience. It's ideal for users who heavily consume media, game for extended periods, or frequently find themselves away from a power outlet. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G if you prefer a brighter, more vibrant display, faster charging speeds (including wireless), and a more responsive overall experience. This phone is best suited for users who value a premium feel and are willing to pay a premium for it.