Samsung Galaxy F62 vs. A72: A Deep Dive into Performance, Display, and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, the Samsung Galaxy F62 offers a significant performance advantage thanks to its Exynos 9825. However, the Galaxy A72 provides a more balanced experience with its brighter display and potentially better thermal management, making it the better choice for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F62 | Samsung Galaxy A72 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 15 | 2021, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, February 22 | Available. Released 2021, March 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) | 165 x 77.4 x 8.4 mm (6.50 x 3.05 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 420 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 & 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, One UI 4.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired 4.5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 7000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Violet, Awesome Blue |
| Models | SM-E625F, SM-E625F/DS | SM-A725F, SM-A725F/DS, SM-A725M, SM-A725M/DS |
| Price | About 270 EUR | £ 174.89 / € 359.99 |
| SAR | 0.74 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.23 W/kg (head) 1.17 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 279342 (v8) GeekBench: 6483 (v4.4), 1627 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy F62
- Significantly more powerful processor (Exynos 9825)
- Better performance for gaming and demanding apps
- Potentially faster app loading times
- Likely less efficient battery life under heavy load
- Potential for thermal throttling
- Display brightness likely lower than A72
Samsung Galaxy A72
- Brighter and potentially more color-accurate display (825 nits)
- More efficient processor (Snapdragon 720G)
- Potentially better thermal management
- Less powerful processor compared to F62
- Lower performance in demanding games and apps
- May not be ideal for heavy multitasking
Display Comparison
The Galaxy A72 boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 825 nits, which significantly improves outdoor visibility compared to the F62 (brightness data unavailable, but expected to be lower). While both feature similar 'Infinite' contrast ratios (nominal), the A72’s higher peak brightness translates to a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience, especially in direct sunlight. The F62’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a focus on cost reduction in this area. The A72’s panel is likely optimized for color accuracy, though specific color gamut coverage isn’t provided.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the A72’s image processing algorithms are likely more refined, offering better dynamic range and noise reduction. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) in the A72 (assumed based on Samsung’s typical implementation) would provide a significant advantage in low-light photography and video recording. The F62’s camera system likely prioritizes affordability over advanced features. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of detail.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Galaxy F62’s Exynos 9825 (7nm) features a more powerful CPU configuration – octa-core with 2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 cores – compared to the A72’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm) with 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold cores. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother performance in demanding applications. However, the Snapdragon 720G’s 8nm process is more efficient, potentially leading to better thermal management and sustained performance during prolonged gaming sessions. The Exynos 9825, while powerful, may be prone to throttling under heavy load. The A72’s Adreno 618 GPU is a capable performer, but the Exynos 9825’s GPU is expected to deliver higher frame rates in graphically intensive games.
Battery Life
Both the Galaxy F62 and A72 achieve an endurance rating of 117 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, this metric doesn’t account for the different power consumption profiles of the Exynos 9825 and Snapdragon 720G. The F62’s more powerful processor will likely drain the battery faster during intensive tasks. Both support 25W wired charging, offering reasonable charging speeds, and 4.5W reverse wired charging for topping up accessories. The A72’s more efficient chipset may allow it to reach a full charge slightly faster in real-world scenarios, despite having the same charging wattage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F62 if you need maximum processing power for gaming, multitasking, or content creation and are willing to potentially trade off some battery efficiency. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A72 if you prefer a brighter, more color-accurate display, a potentially smoother user experience due to the Snapdragon 720G’s efficiency, and a more balanced overall package for everyday use.