Samsung Galaxy F62 vs A54: Which Exynos-Powered Samsung is Right for You?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A54 is the superior choice. While the F62 boasts an older, more powerful chipset on paper, the A54’s more efficient Exynos 1380, coupled with its brighter display and refined software experience, delivers a smoother and more enjoyable daily experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F62 | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 15 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, February 22 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 420 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 & 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 (7 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired 4.5W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | SM-E625F, SM-E625F/DS | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 270 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | 0.74 W/kg (head) | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy F62
- Potentially higher raw CPU performance (Exynos 9825)
- May offer a larger battery capacity (unconfirmed)
- Lower price point (likely due to age)
- Less power-efficient chipset (Exynos 9825)
- Likely inferior display quality
- Older software and potentially fewer updates
Samsung Galaxy A54
- More power-efficient chipset (Exynos 1380)
- Brighter and more vibrant display (980 nits)
- Longer battery life (119h endurance rating)
- More modern design and software
- Potentially lower raw CPU performance compared to F62
- Higher price point
- May not be ideal for extremely demanding tasks
Display Comparison
The Galaxy A54’s display significantly outperforms the F62 in several key areas. The A54 achieves a measured peak brightness of 980 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight, a metric the F62 likely falls short of. While both feature similar resolutions, the A54’s contrast ratio is listed as 'Infinite (nominal)', suggesting a superior AMOLED panel with deeper blacks. The F62’s display specifications are less detailed, implying a less advanced panel technology. This translates to a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience on the A54.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the F62. The A54 benefits from Samsung’s improved image processing algorithms and likely features a more modern sensor setup. While the F62 may offer a higher megapixel count in some areas, the A54’s image stabilization (OIS) and optimized software processing will likely result in superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of details regarding the F62’s camera system makes a definitive comparison difficult, but the A54’s newer technology gives it a clear advantage.
Performance
On paper, the F62’s Exynos 9825 (7nm) appears more potent than the A54’s Exynos 1380 (5nm). The 9825 utilizes a combination of Cortex-A75 and A55 cores alongside custom Exynos M4 cores, while the 1380 relies on Cortex-A78 and A55 cores. However, the 5nm fabrication process of the 1380 provides significantly improved power efficiency. This means the A54 is likely to experience less thermal throttling under sustained load, resulting in more consistent performance during gaming and demanding applications. The A54’s CPU architecture, with the newer Cortex-A78 cores, also offers improved single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and general usability.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A54 boasts an impressive endurance rating of 119 hours, backed by a real-world active use score of 11 hours and 15 minutes. While the F62’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its older, less efficient chipset likely results in shorter battery life despite potentially having a larger capacity. Both phones support 25W wired charging, but the A54’s more efficient processor means it can reach a full charge faster and maintain that charge for longer periods. The A54 also offers 4.5W reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F62 if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding tasks and don't mind a larger, less refined design. It's ideal for users who frequently engage in heavy multitasking or older, graphically intensive games. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A54 if you prefer a more balanced experience with a brighter, more color-accurate display, longer-lasting battery life, and a more modern design, making it perfect for everyday use, photography, and moderate gaming.