OnePlus Nord 5 vs Samsung Galaxy F62: A Deep Dive into Performance, Battery, and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 5 emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 offers a substantial performance leap over the Galaxy F62’s Exynos 9825, coupled with incredibly fast 80W charging and impressive battery endurance. While the F62 provides excellent value, the Nord 5 delivers a more refined and future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F62 | OnePlus Nord 5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 15 | 2025, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, February 22 | Available. Released 2025, July 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) | 163.4 x 77 x 8.1 mm (6.43 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 211 g (7.44 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1272 x 2800 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.83 inches, 113.3 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 420 nits (peak) | Swift AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1400 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 & 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, Ultra HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired 4.5W reverse wired | 80W wired, 33W PPS, 18W PD, 100% in just 54 min 5W reverse wired Bypass charging |
| Type | Li-Po 7000 mAh | Market-dependent versions:· 5200 mAh (Europe)· 6800 mAh (Global) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Phantom Grey, Dry Ice, Marble Sands |
| Models | SM-E625F, SM-E625F/DS | CPH2709 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | £ 339.00 / € 294.97 / ₹ 31,998 |
| SAR | 0.74 W/kg (head) | 1.18 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 49:12h endurance, 1200 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class C (90 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class B |
Samsung Galaxy F62
- Excellent value for money
- Flagship-level processor for its time
- Decent battery life (estimated)
- Older chipset – performance lags behind newer devices
- Slower charging speed
- Likely limited software update support
OnePlus Nord 5
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 processor
- Ultra-fast 80W charging
- Impressive battery endurance
- Bypass charging for cooler operation
- Higher price point
- May not represent a massive leap in camera quality (without further specs)
- Potential for software bloat (typical of OnePlus)
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 5 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1330 nits, compared to the Galaxy F62’s unspecified brightness. This higher peak brightness translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the F62’s panel technology isn’t specified, the Nord 5’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor usability. We expect the Nord 5 to have a more modern panel with potentially higher refresh rates and color accuracy, though this isn't confirmed in the provided data.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Nord 5’s positioning as a more premium device, it’s reasonable to expect a more advanced camera system with a larger main sensor and improved image processing. The F62 likely relies on software optimizations to compensate for potentially less capable hardware. The absence of information regarding OIS on either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Samsung Galaxy F62 utilizes the 7nm Exynos 9825, while the OnePlus Nord 5 features the 4nm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon offers superior power efficiency, leading to less thermal throttling during sustained workloads. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s CPU configuration – a Cortex-X4 prime core alongside Cortex-A720 performance cores – provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Exynos 9825’s older Cortex-A75 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the Nord 5.
Battery Life
The OnePlus Nord 5’s battery endurance of 49:12h and active use score of 13:47h demonstrate a significant advantage over what we’d expect from the Galaxy F62, which lacks endurance data. Crucially, the Nord 5’s 80W wired charging – with support for 33W PPS and 18W PD – allows for a full charge in just 54 minutes, a massive improvement over the F62’s 25W charging. The Nord 5 also offers bypass charging, allowing it to operate directly from the power adapter, reducing heat generation during prolonged use. The F62’s 4.5W reverse wired charging is also significantly slower than the Nord 5’s 5W reverse charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F62 if you prioritize maximizing value and are comfortable with a slightly older chipset. It’s ideal for users who primarily browse, use social media, and engage in casual gaming. Buy the OnePlus Nord 5 if you demand faster performance for demanding apps and games, appreciate the convenience of incredibly rapid charging, and value a longer software support lifecycle. It’s the better choice for power users and mobile gamers.