The Samsung Galaxy F62 and Motorola Moto G9 Plus represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The F62, leveraging a flagship-class Exynos 9825 chipset, aims for raw power, while the Moto G9 Plus prioritizes efficiency with the Snapdragon 730G and a focus on battery endurance. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and occasional gaming, the Samsung Galaxy F62 is the better choice, thanks to its Exynos 9825. However, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus offers a more balanced experience with comparable battery life and efficient performance for everyday tasks, making it ideal for mainstream users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 Brazil |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 15 | 2020, September 07. Released 2020, September 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, February 22 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.3 x 9.5 mm (6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 in) | 170 x 78.1 x 9.7 mm (6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 223 g (7.87 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus, 420 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.73 GHz Exynos M4 & 2x2.40 GHz Cortex-A75 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 9825 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP12 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (standard) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired
4.5W reverse wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Laser Green, Laser Gray, Laser Blue | Rose Gold, Indigo Blue |
| Models | SM-E625F, SM-E625F/DS | XT2087-1 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | 0.74 W/kg (head) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 136h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1356:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.0 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 253105 (v8)
GeekBench: 1695 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy F62
- More powerful Exynos 9825 processor for demanding tasks.
- Potential for superior display quality (assuming AMOLED panel).
- Reverse wireless charging capability.
- Potentially higher thermal throttling under sustained load.
- Slower wired charging (25W vs 30W).
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
- More efficient Snapdragon 730G processor for longer battery life.
- Faster 30W wired charging.
- Streamlined software experience.
- Less powerful processor for gaming and demanding applications.
- Potentially lower display quality compared to Samsung’s AMOLED offerings.
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 522 nits and a 1356:1 contrast ratio, providing a visually acceptable experience. However, the Galaxy F62’s display specifications are not provided, leaving a gap in direct comparison. Given Samsung’s display expertise, it’s reasonable to expect comparable or superior brightness and contrast. The G9 Plus’s contrast ratio, while decent, doesn’t indicate the use of advanced panel technology like AMOLED, which the F62 may feature, potentially offering richer colors and deeper blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Moto G9 Plus suggests a focus on versatility over image quality, as these sensors typically deliver limited detail. The F62, potentially leveraging Samsung’s image processing algorithms, may offer superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions, assuming it features a larger primary sensor.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy F62’s Exynos 9825, built on a 7nm process, offers significantly more raw processing power than the Motorola Moto G9 Plus’s Snapdragon 730G (8nm). The Exynos’s octa-core configuration, with two high-performance Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 2.40 GHz, is designed for demanding tasks. While the Snapdragon 730G’s Kryo 470 Gold cores at 2.2 GHz are efficient, they lack the outright speed of the Exynos. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking on the F62. However, the 8nm process of the Snapdragon 730G contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads compared to the 7nm Exynos.
Battery Life
Both the Samsung Galaxy F62 and Motorola Moto G9 Plus share an endurance rating of 136 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life. However, their charging capabilities differ. The Moto G9 Plus supports 30W wired charging, while the F62 offers 25W. This means the G9 Plus will likely charge from 0-100% faster. The F62 compensates with 4.5W reverse wired charging, allowing it to top up other devices – a feature absent on the G9 Plus. The similar endurance ratings suggest that despite the more powerful processor in the F62, software optimization and battery capacity are well-matched.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F62 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding applications, enjoy mobile gaming, and appreciate the potential for future-proofing. Buy the Motorola Moto G9 Plus if you prefer a consistently smooth experience for everyday tasks, prioritize long battery life, and value a more streamlined software experience without the performance overhead of a flagship chipset.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 9825 in the Galaxy F62 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 9825 is a powerful chip, and while it offers excellent performance, it's known to generate more heat than the Snapdragon 730G. Expect some thermal throttling during extended gaming, potentially leading to a slight performance dip after a while. However, the extent of throttling will depend on the game and ambient temperature.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on the Moto G9 Plus actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget and mid-range phones offer limited detail and image quality. While they allow you to focus very close to subjects, the low resolution results in soft, often noisy images. It's a nice-to-have feature, but don't expect professional-level macro photography.
❓ Can the Samsung Galaxy F62 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile at high frame rates (90fps)?
The Exynos 9825 has the processing power to potentially run PUBG Mobile at high frame rates, but it depends on the game's optimization and the phone's thermal management. You may need to lower graphics settings to maintain a stable 90fps and avoid overheating during extended gameplay.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G9 Plus with the 30W charger?
With the included 30W charger, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus should fully charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 60-75 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Samsung Galaxy F62's 25W charging, which will likely take closer to 90-120 minutes.
