Samsung Galaxy F56 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+: Which Mid-Range Champion Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and sustained battery life, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its 120W charging and impressive 10:38h active use battery score significantly outweigh the Galaxy F56’s slightly different CPU architecture.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F56 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 07 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 14 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), plastic frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 162 x 77.3 x 7.2 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.28 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~382 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED+, 120Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Xclipse 530 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 12 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Green, Violet | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | SM-E566B, SM-E566B/DS | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | ₹ 23,250 | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | 0.71 W/kg (head) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy F56
- Familiar Samsung One UI experience
- Potentially optimized software integration with Exynos 1480
- 4nm Exynos 1480 offers good efficiency
- Slower 45W charging
- Battery life likely inferior to Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (0-100% in 19 minutes)
- Exceptional battery life (10:38h active use)
- Brighter 1283 nits display
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
- Potential for bloatware
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ immediately stands out with its measured peak brightness of 1283 nits, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Galaxy F56 (brightness data unavailable). While the F56’s panel technology isn’t specified, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ likely utilizes an AMOLED panel, common in this price bracket, providing vibrant colors and deep blacks. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rates to balance smoothness and power consumption. Bezels are expected to be similar, with both aiming for a modern, immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Galaxy F56, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is expected to feature a high-resolution main sensor (likely 200MP, based on the series), coupled with optical image stabilization (OIS) for sharper images and videos. The Exynos 1480’s ISP capabilities are solid, but the Redmi’s sensor size and OIS will likely result in superior low-light performance and dynamic range. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing feature with limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: Samsung’s Exynos 1480 (4nm) versus MediaTek’s Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4nm). The Dimensity 7200 Ultra features a more modern CPU architecture with 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 cores, potentially offering a performance edge over the F56’s 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 cores in CPU-intensive tasks. Both chips are built on a 4nm process, ensuring good efficiency. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ benefits from this newer architecture, translating to potentially smoother multitasking and faster app loading times. While both likely pair with ample RAM, the Redmi’s CPU architecture gives it a slight advantage.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ truly shines in the battery department. Its active use score of 10:38h demonstrates exceptional endurance, likely due to the efficient Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset and optimized software. The Galaxy F56’s battery capacity is unknown, but the Redmi’s score is a significant advantage. Crucially, the Redmi supports 120W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes, a game-changer for users who value convenience. The F56’s 45W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly more time to reach 100%.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F56 if you prioritize a familiar Samsung user experience and potentially benefit from the optimized software integration with the Exynos 1480. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you demand the fastest possible charging speeds, exceptional battery endurance, and a brighter display for outdoor visibility. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is the clear choice for power users and those constantly on the go.