Samsung Galaxy F56 vs A54: Which Samsung Mid-Ranger Reigns Supreme?

Samsung's mid-range offerings are increasingly competitive, and the Galaxy F56 and A54 represent compelling options. The F56 arrives with a newer Exynos 1480 chipset and faster charging, while the A54 boasts a proven track record and excellent battery endurance. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone delivers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A54 remains the more sensible choice. Its proven 119-hour endurance rating and 980 nits of brightness offer a more consistently reliable experience. While the F56’s Exynos 1480 offers a slight CPU clock speed bump, the A54’s overall optimization and battery performance are more impactful for daily use.

PHONES
Phone Names Samsung Galaxy F56 Samsung Galaxy A54
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub61, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 -25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA
Launch
Announced2025, May 072023, March 15
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, May 14Available. Released 2023, March 24
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), plastic frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus+)Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame
Dimensions162 x 77.3 x 7.2 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.28 in)158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight180 g (6.35 oz)202 g (7.13 oz)
 -IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus+Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~382 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density)
Size6.74 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper AMOLED+, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetExynos 1480 (4 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
GPUXclipse 530Mali-G68 MP5
OSAndroid 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7
Memory
Card slotNomicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, panorama, HDRLED flash, panorama, HDR
Single-32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro)50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro)
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR-
Single12 MP, f/2.2, (wide)32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
VideoYes4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -No
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE5.3, A2DP, LE
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only)
 -Virtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging45W wired25W wired
Type5000 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsGreen, VioletLime, Graphite, Violet, White
ModelsSM-E566B, SM-E566B/DSSM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W
Price₹ 23,250€ 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999
SAR0.71 W/kg (head)0.81 W/kg (head)     0.67 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-0.69 W/kg (head)     1.34 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 119h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -26.6 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Samsung Galaxy F56

  • Faster 45W charging for quicker top-ups
  • Potentially higher CPU performance with Exynos 1480
  • Newer chipset may receive longer software support

  • Battery life is currently unknown and could be lower than A54
  • Camera specs are currently unknown
  • Potential for thermal throttling due to higher clock speeds

Samsung Galaxy A54

  • Excellent battery life with 119-hour endurance rating
  • Bright 980 nits display for outdoor visibility
  • Proven camera performance and image quality

  • Slower 25W charging
  • Older Exynos 1380 chipset
  • May not receive as many future software updates as the F56

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A54 features a display capable of reaching 980 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the F56’s display specs are currently unavailable, the A54’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a high-quality AMOLED panel. The A54’s brightness advantage is significant for outdoor use, and its established panel quality provides a more predictable viewing experience. Without knowing the F56’s panel technology, it’s difficult to assess potential differences in color accuracy or refresh rate.

Camera Comparison

Both the F56 and A54 are equipped with photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the F56. The A54’s camera system is known for its reliable performance and image processing. Without knowing the main sensor resolution or aperture of the F56, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. It’s reasonable to assume both phones will offer similar software features and shooting modes, but the A54’s established track record provides more confidence in consistent image quality. We'll need to see sample images from the F56 to assess its capabilities.

Performance

The Galaxy F56’s Exynos 1480 (4nm) chipset boasts a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed (2.75 GHz vs 2.4 GHz) compared to the A54’s Exynos 1380 (5nm). However, the 5nm process node used in the 1380 generally translates to better power efficiency and thermal management. This means the A54 is likely to sustain peak performance for longer periods without significant throttling. Both chips utilize the same Cortex-A78 and A55 core configuration, suggesting similar architectural strengths, but the F56’s advantage is likely marginal in real-world scenarios. The F56’s 4nm node *should* improve efficiency, but the A54’s mature software optimization is a strong counterpoint.

Battery Life

The Samsung Galaxy A54 excels in battery life, achieving an impressive endurance rating of 119 hours and 11:15 hours of active use. The F56 offers 45W wired charging, significantly faster than the A54’s 25W charging. While the F56’s battery capacity is unknown, the faster charging speed allows for quicker top-ups. However, the A54’s exceptional endurance means users may not need to charge as frequently, mitigating the benefit of faster charging. The A54’s efficiency, combined with its proven endurance, makes it the clear winner in this category.

Buying Guide

Buy the Samsung Galaxy F56 if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding tasks like video editing or gaming and value the convenience of 45W fast charging. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A54 if you prioritize all-day battery life, a bright and vibrant display, and a well-rounded, consistently reliable experience. The A54 is ideal for users who value longevity and don't need the absolute latest chipset.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Exynos 1480 in the F56 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 1480 offers a slight clock speed increase, the 4nm process should help mitigate heat. However, without extensive testing, it's difficult to say definitively. The A54’s 5nm Exynos 1380 is known for its efficient thermal management, suggesting it may sustain peak performance for longer periods.
❓ How much faster is the 45W charging on the F56 compared to the A54’s 25W charging?
45W charging will significantly reduce charging times. Expect a 0-100% charge on the F56 to be noticeably quicker than the A54, potentially shaving off 30-60 minutes depending on battery capacity. However, the A54’s excellent battery life may mean you won’t need to charge as often.
❓ Is the difference in CPU performance between the Exynos 1480 and 1380 noticeable in everyday tasks?
For typical smartphone usage – browsing, social media, streaming – the difference will likely be minimal. Both chips are capable of handling these tasks smoothly. The 1480’s advantage will be more apparent in demanding applications like video editing or graphically intensive games.
❓ Will the Samsung Galaxy F56 receive more software updates than the A54?
Generally, newer devices receive longer software support. The F56, being a newer release, is likely to receive more Android OS updates and security patches than the A54. However, Samsung typically provides several years of support for its A-series devices.