Samsung Galaxy F55 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around usability and a smoother, more consistent experience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its significantly faster 120W charging and brighter display outweigh the Galaxy F55’s slightly more efficient chipset, offering a more convenient and visually engaging daily experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F55 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 17 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 27 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8 mm (6.45 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED+, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Apricot | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | SM-E556B/DS, SM-E556B | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | ₹ 17,890 | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | 0.93 W/kg (head) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy F55
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 offers a balanced performance profile.
- Potentially better software optimization and long-term support from Samsung.
- 4nm process ensures good power efficiency.
- Significantly slower 45W charging compared to the Redmi Note 13 Pro+.
- Likely a less bright display, impacting outdoor visibility.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Blazing-fast 120W charging for minimal downtime.
- 1283 nits peak brightness provides excellent outdoor visibility.
- Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra offers a CPU performance advantage.
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing.
- Potentially less efficient power management due to the brighter display.
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 1283 nits, compared to an unstated peak brightness for the Galaxy F55. This makes the Xiaomi device far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Redmi’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. We expect the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ to have a higher contrast ratio, enhancing visual pop. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rate switching to conserve battery, but the Redmi’s brighter panel will consume more power at peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is known for its high-resolution main sensors in the series, suggesting a focus on detail capture. The Galaxy F55 likely employs a more conservative approach, prioritizing image processing and color science. The absence of information regarding Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. We anticipate the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ to offer more versatile camera capabilities due to Xiaomi’s history of including multiple lenses, though the quality of those additional lenses is often questionable.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is equipped with the Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, featuring 2x 2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 cores. This configuration offers a theoretical CPU performance advantage over the Samsung Galaxy F55’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (1x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A710, 3x 2.36 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A510). The Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s newer core architecture (A715 vs A710) translates to improved single-core performance. Both chipsets are fabricated on a 4nm process, ensuring reasonable power efficiency, but the Redmi’s more modern CPU design gives it an edge in demanding tasks. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1’s GPU may offer competitive gaming performance, but the Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s overall system-on-chip (SoC) efficiency could lead to better sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ shines with its 120W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 19 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Galaxy F55’s 45W charging. While the Galaxy F55’s battery capacity is unknown, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ demonstrates a real-world active use score of 10 hours and 38 minutes. The faster charging speed of the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery capacity, offering a more convenient charging experience for users who frequently need to top up their devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F55 if you prioritize sustained performance during extended gaming sessions and value Qualcomm’s established software ecosystem. Its Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 chipset, while not the fastest, offers a balance of power and efficiency. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you demand the fastest possible charging speeds, a vibrant and easily visible display, and a longer-lasting battery in typical use. It’s the ideal choice for users constantly on the go.