Poco X6 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy F55: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset delivers significantly superior CPU and GPU performance, coupled with faster 67W charging. While the Galaxy F55 offers a respectable experience, the Poco X6 Pro provides a more future-proof and responsive user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F55 | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 17 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 27 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8 mm (6.45 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED+, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Apricot | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | SM-E556B/DS, SM-E556B | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | ₹ 17,890 | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR | 0.93 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy F55
- Established Brand Reputation
- Potentially Optimized Software Experience
- Reliable Performance for Everyday Tasks
- Inferior Chipset Performance
- Slower Charging Speed
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Superior Chipset Performance (Dimensity 8300 Ultra)
- Faster 67W Charging
- Brighter Display
- Xiaomi’s MIUI Software Can Be Divisive
- Potentially Less Polished Software Updates
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro takes a clear lead in display quality, boasting a measured peak brightness of 1148 nits. This significantly surpasses what we'd expect from the Galaxy F55, making the Poco X6 Pro more usable in direct sunlight. While the Galaxy F55’s display specs are not provided, Samsung typically employs AMOLED panels with good color accuracy, but likely won’t reach the same peak brightness. The absence of LTPO technology in either phone suggests neither will offer adaptive refresh rates for optimal power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Galaxy F55, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Poco X6 Pro’s camera system is likely to offer a more versatile experience. The focus should be on the main sensor and its aperture, as these are the biggest determinants of low-light performance. We can assume the Poco X6 Pro will offer a wider range of shooting modes and potentially better video stabilization. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely inconsequential, offering minimal benefit to most users.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra, with its 3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 prime core and three additional Cortex-A715 cores, demonstrably outperforms the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 in the Galaxy F55. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1’s configuration of one 2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 and three 2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 cores, alongside four 1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 cores, is simply outmatched. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience on the Poco X6 Pro. Both are built on a 4nm process, but the architectural advantages of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra are substantial.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging, supporting QC2.0 and PD3.0, and achieving a full charge in 45 minutes, is a significant advantage over the Galaxy F55’s 45W charging. While the Galaxy F55’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Poco X6 Pro’s active use score of 11:46h demonstrates excellent battery life. The faster charging speed of the Poco X6 Pro minimizes downtime, making it ideal for users who are constantly on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F55 if you prioritize a brand with a well-established ecosystem and a generally more conservative software experience. It's a solid all-rounder for everyday tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you demand maximum performance for gaming and demanding applications, and value faster charging speeds. It’s the clear choice for power users and mobile gamers.