Samsung Galaxy F55 vs A55: A Deep Dive into Samsung's Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A55 emerges as the better all-rounder. Its superior display brightness (1010 nits) and longer battery life (13:27h active use) provide a more polished daily experience. While the F55's Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 offers competitive performance, the A55's overall package is more refined.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F55 | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 17 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 27 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8 mm (6.45 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED+, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Apricot | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | SM-E556B/DS, SM-E556B | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | ₹ 17,890 | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR | 0.93 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy F55
- Faster 45W charging for quicker power-ups.
- Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 offers strong processing capabilities.
- Potentially better thermal management for sustained gaming.
- Unusual CPU core configuration may impact sustained performance.
- Likely lower display brightness compared to the A55.
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Exceptional battery life (13:27h active use).
- Brighter display (1010 nits) for excellent outdoor visibility.
- Faster CPU clock speeds for responsive performance.
- Slower 25W charging.
- Exynos 1480 may exhibit more thermal throttling under heavy load.
Display Comparison
The Galaxy A55 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1010 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the F55's display specs are not provided, the A55's brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor use. The A55's panel likely benefits from Samsung's display expertise, potentially offering superior color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of LTPO technology in either model suggests both utilize a standard refresh rate panel, impacting power consumption compared to adaptive refresh rate displays.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is challenging. However, given the market positioning, it's reasonable to assume both phones feature similar primary camera sensors. The image processing style will likely differ, with Samsung's software tuning playing a crucial role. The F55 may lean towards a more vibrant, saturated look, while the A55 could prioritize natural color reproduction. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the main sensor of either device would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on both is largely a marketing feature with limited practical utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Galaxy F55 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm), featuring a Cortex-A710 prime core clocked at 2.4 GHz. The A55, conversely, employs the Exynos 1480 (4nm) with a faster Cortex-A78 prime core at 2.75 GHz. While the A78 architecture is generally more efficient than the A710, the Snapdragon's optimized GPU and potentially better thermal management could provide a smoother gaming experience. Both phones utilize 4nm fabrication, suggesting comparable power efficiency, but the A55's CPU clock speed advantage may translate to quicker app loading and responsiveness in everyday tasks. The F55's CPU configuration (1x2.4GHz + 3x2.36GHz) is unusual, potentially indicating a cost-saving measure that could impact sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A55 demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, achieving 13 hours and 27 minutes of active use. While the F55's battery capacity is unknown, the A55's endurance is impressive. The F55 compensates with faster 45W wired charging, potentially reducing charging times compared to the A55's 25W charging. However, the A55's superior battery life minimizes the need for frequent top-ups, making it more convenient for users who prioritize all-day battery performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F55 if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding apps and occasional gaming, and value the faster 45W charging. This phone suits users who frequently multitask or run resource-intensive applications. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer a brighter, more vibrant display, exceptional battery endurance, and a consistently smooth user experience. This is the ideal choice for everyday users, content consumers, and those who prioritize longevity.