Samsung Galaxy F55 vs Realme 12 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and all-day battery life, the Realme 12 Pro+ emerges as the winner. Its 67W charging and impressive 13:24h active use score outweigh the Galaxy F55’s slightly different processor architecture. However, Samsung’s software experience may appeal to some.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F55 | Realme 12 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 17 | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 27 | Available. Released 2024, January 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 76.5 x 7.8 mm (6.45 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED+, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 644 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.4, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Apricot | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red |
| Models | SM-E556B/DS, SM-E556B | RMX3840, RMX3841 |
| Price | ₹ 17,890 | $ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400 |
| SAR | 0.93 W/kg (head) | - |
Samsung Galaxy F55
- Familiar Samsung One UI experience
- Potentially longer software support
- Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 offers solid performance
- Slower 45W charging
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Unusual CPU core configuration may not optimize efficiency
Realme 12 Pro+
- 67W fast charging (50% in 19 min)
- Excellent 13:24h active use battery life
- Brighter 802 nit display
- Realme UI may not appeal to all users
- Potentially shorter software support compared to Samsung
- Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, while efficient, isn't a performance leap
Display Comparison
The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 802 nits, crucial for comfortable outdoor viewing. While the Galaxy F55’s display specifications are not provided, Realme’s peak brightness offers a tangible advantage. Both phones utilize 4nm chipsets, suggesting similar power efficiency in display operation, but the Realme’s brightness will impact overall system power draw. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests a standard 60Hz or 120Hz refresh rate, impacting smoothness compared to flagship devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ is known for its 50MP main camera with OIS, a feature likely absent on the F55 given its positioning. OIS is critical for sharp images and stable video, especially in low light. The absence of information regarding sensor size on the F55 makes it difficult to assess its low-light capabilities. It’s safe to assume both phones include standard ultra-wide and potentially macro lenses, but the quality of these secondary sensors is often negligible.
Performance
Both the Galaxy F55 and Realme 12 Pro+ employ 4nm Snapdragon 7-series chipsets, but their architectures differ. The F55 features the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, utilizing Cortex-A710 cores, while the 12 Pro+ uses the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 with Cortex-A78 cores. While clock speeds are similar (2.4 GHz peak on both), the A78 cores in the 7s Gen 2 generally offer better sustained performance and efficiency compared to the A710. This translates to potentially smoother multitasking and slightly improved gaming performance on the Realme 12 Pro+. The F55’s CPU configuration (1x2.4GHz A710, 3x2.36GHz A710, 4x1.8GHz A510) is unusual with the duplication of A710 cores, potentially indicating a focus on burst performance rather than sustained efficiency.
Battery Life
The Realme 12 Pro+ shines in battery performance, achieving an impressive 13 hours and 24 minutes of active use. Coupled with its 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 19 minutes, it minimizes downtime. The Galaxy F55’s 45W charging is slower, meaning a full charge will take considerably longer. While the F55’s battery capacity is unknown, the Realme’s combination of efficient chipset and fast charging provides a clear advantage for users who demand all-day battery life and quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F55 if you prioritize a familiar Samsung One UI experience and potentially longer software support. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you value faster charging, extended battery life, and a brighter display for outdoor visibility. The Realme is the better choice for power users and those frequently on the go.