Samsung's Galaxy F52 5G and A52s 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at accessible price points, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in the chipset department. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset delivers a noticeable performance uplift over the F52 5G’s Snapdragon 750G, translating to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and improved gaming experiences. While battery life is comparable, the A52s 5G’s brighter display adds to its overall appeal.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 78 Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 20 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 01 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 76.3 x 8.7 mm (6.48 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, One UI 3.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Black | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | SM-E5260 | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 260 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy F52 5G
- Potentially lower price point
- Comparable battery endurance
- 5G connectivity
- Less powerful Snapdragon 750G chipset
- Likely dimmer display
- Inferior CPU architecture
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Brighter 800 nit display
- More efficient 6nm process
- Potentially higher price
- Similar battery endurance to F52 5G
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 800 nits compared to the F52 5G’s unspecified brightness. This higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both displays feature an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal), suggesting excellent black levels. While neither specification details refresh rate, the A52s 5G is widely known to have a 120Hz display, a feature absent in the F52 5G, resulting in smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are equipped with photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. However, the A52s 5G’s superior image signal processor (ISP), integrated within the Snapdragon 778G, likely provides better image processing, resulting in improved dynamic range and noise reduction. The absence of specific sensor details makes a definitive camera comparison difficult, but the A52s 5G’s more powerful chipset gives it an edge in computational photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The A52s 5G utilizes the Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm), built on a more efficient 6nm process, while the F52 5G features the SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm). The 778G’s CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core, 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 performance cores, and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores – is a substantial upgrade over the F52 5G’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570 configuration. This architectural advantage, coupled with the smaller process node, results in faster processing speeds and improved power efficiency for the A52s 5G.
Battery Life
Both the Galaxy F52 5G and A52s 5G share an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage scenarios. Both support 25W wired charging, suggesting similar charging speeds. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G may contribute to slightly better power efficiency during demanding tasks, potentially offsetting the impact of any minor battery capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F52 5G if your primary concern is maximizing battery life on a tight budget and you primarily engage in light smartphone tasks like browsing and social media. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you prioritize performance for gaming, demanding apps, and a brighter, more vibrant display, and are willing to spend a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G handle demanding games like Genshin Impact or PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G is a capable chipset for gaming. It offers a significant performance boost over the 750G, allowing for smoother frame rates and a more enjoyable gaming experience in titles like Genshin Impact and PUBG Mobile, even at higher graphics settings. While not a flagship-level experience, it's more than adequate for most mobile gamers.
❓ Does the Galaxy A52s 5G experience significant thermal throttling during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 778G can generate some heat under sustained load, the A52s 5G’s thermal management is generally effective. Reports indicate minimal throttling during typical gaming sessions. The 6nm process contributes to better thermal efficiency compared to the 8nm process used in the F52 5G, reducing the likelihood of significant performance drops due to overheating.
❓ Is the 25W charging speed on both phones fast enough for quick top-ups throughout the day?
25W charging is a respectable speed for mid-range phones. While not as fast as some flagship devices, it will typically charge both the F52 5G and A52s 5G from 0% to 50% in around 30-45 minutes. It's sufficient for a quick top-up during a lunch break or before heading out.
