Samsung Galaxy F42 5G vs Galaxy F23: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy F23 edges out the F42 5G thanks to its faster charging, slightly better performance, and potentially improved camera capabilities. While the F42 5G offers a larger screen, the F23's overall package makes it the more appealing choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F42 5G | Samsung Galaxy F23 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 29 | 2022, March 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 03 | Available. Released 2022, March 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.2 x 76.4 x 9 mm (6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 165.5 x 77 x 8.4 mm (6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 90Hz | TFT LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI core 5 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1152p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Matte Aqua, Matte Black | Aqua Blue, Forest Green |
| Models | SM-E426B, SM-E426B/DS | SM-E236B, SM-E236B/DS |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 190 EUR |
| SAR | 0.47 W/kg (head) | 1.24 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body) | - |
Samsung Galaxy F42 5G
- Larger Display
- Competitive Price
- Decent Performance for Casual Use
- Slower Charging
- Potentially Weaker Performance
- Less Refined Camera
Samsung Galaxy F23
- Faster Charging (25W)
- Better Performance (Snapdragon 750G)
- Potentially Improved Camera
- Smaller Display
- Slightly Higher Price (potentially)
Display Comparison
The Galaxy F42 5G boasts a larger 6.6-inch display compared to the F23's 6.4-inch screen. Both utilize Super AMOLED panels, promising vibrant colors and deep blacks. However, the F23 may have a slightly higher refresh rate (potentially 120Hz) offering smoother scrolling and animations, while the F42 5G is likely 90Hz. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
While both phones feature multiple rear cameras, the F23 is expected to have a more capable main sensor and potentially better image processing. The F23 likely has a 50MP main camera, while the F42 5G likely has a 64MP main camera. However, software and image processing are crucial, and the F23's Snapdragon chipset often benefits from better camera algorithms. Both likely have ultrawide and macro lenses.
Performance
The Galaxy F23's Snapdragon 750G chipset (8nm) generally outperforms the F42 5G's Dimensity 700 (7nm) in real-world usage. The Snapdragon offers better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking and gaming. Both have ample RAM (likely 6GB/8GB) but the Snapdragon's efficiency gives it an edge.
Battery Life
The Galaxy F23 has a clear advantage with its 25W fast charging support, significantly faster than the F42 5G's 15W charging. Both phones likely have a similar battery capacity (around 5000mAh), but the faster charging on the F23 means quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy F42 5G? Users prioritizing a larger display for media consumption and gaming on a tight budget. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy F23? Those seeking a more balanced experience with faster charging, potentially better camera performance, and a more modern design.