Choosing a new Samsung phone can be tough, especially with so many options. The Galaxy F42 5G and Galaxy A34 both offer compelling features at competitive prices. But which one is right for you? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs, performance, and more.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy A34 emerges as the stronger contender, boasting a brighter display, faster charging, and a more powerful chipset. While the F42 5G offers 5G connectivity, the A34's overall package provides a better user experience and future-proofing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 29 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 03 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.2 x 76.4 x 9 mm (6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI core 5 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1152p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Matte Aqua, Matte Black | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | SM-E426B, SM-E426B/DS | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR | 0.47 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body) | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 133h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 472126 (v9)
GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6)
GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy F42 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- Decent Display
- Affordable Price
- Slower Charging (15W)
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Lower Brightness Display
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Brighter Display (1009 nits)
- Faster Charging (25W)
- More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 1080)
- Generally Better Camera Performance
- Potentially Higher Price
- Infinite Contrast Ratio (Nominal - needs verification)
Display Comparison
The Galaxy A34 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its 1009 nits max brightness is significantly higher than the F42 5G, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests deeper blacks and richer colors on the A34. While the F42 5G has a decent display, it lacks the vibrancy and brightness of the A34.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specs are missing. However, the Galaxy A34 generally has a reputation for better camera performance within its price range, likely due to software optimization and potentially better sensors. Further testing would be needed for a definitive comparison.
Performance
The Galaxy A34's Mediatek Dimensity 1080 chipset (6nm) outperforms the F42 5G's Dimensity 700 (7nm). The A34's Cortex-A78 cores offer a noticeable speed boost for demanding tasks and gaming. Both phones have 6x Cortex-A55 cores, but the A34's overall architecture is more efficient and powerful.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an impressive endurance rating of 133h, suggesting excellent battery life. However, the Galaxy A34's 25W wired charging is significantly faster than the F42 5G's 15W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy F42 5G? Users prioritizing 5G connectivity on a tight budget. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A34? Those seeking a brighter display, better performance, faster charging, and a more refined overall experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Galaxy F42 5G good for gaming?
The Galaxy F42 5G can handle casual games, but demanding titles may experience lag or reduced frame rates due to its less powerful chipset.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Galaxy A34 typically receives longer software update support from Samsung compared to the F42 5G.