The Samsung Galaxy F41, released in late 2020, represented a strong value proposition in the mid-range. Now, the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT enters the arena, boasting a newer chipset and significantly faster charging. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which device best fits your needs, particularly focusing on performance and charging speed.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 1100 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Samsung Galaxy F41’s Exynos 9611, and the 67W charging is a game-changer. While the F41 offers a more conservative power profile, the X3 GT’s advantages are too significant to ignore.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 08. Released 2020, October 16 | 2021, July 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, August 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 75.1 x 8.9 mm (6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 420 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 9611 (10 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.1 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, 960fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fusion Black, Fusion Blue, Fusion Green | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | SM-F415F/DS, SM-F415F | 21061110AG |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | 0.38 W/kg (head) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.58 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 110h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1425:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506800 (v8) | 578505 (v9)
GeekBench: 2310 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy F41
- Potentially more efficient chipset for longer standby times.
- More established brand reputation (Samsung).
- Generally lower price point (depending on market).
- Significantly slower charging speed (15W).
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks.
- Likely to exhibit more throttling under sustained load.
Xiaomi Poco X3 GT
- Much faster 67W charging with PD3.0.
- Superior performance with the Dimensity 1100 chipset.
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
- Likely better camera performance.
- Potentially slightly lower battery life due to more powerful processor.
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing.
- May be slightly more expensive.
Display Comparison
Both devices feature a 1425:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar visual pop. However, the Poco X3 GT’s measured peak brightness of 537 nits surpasses what’s typically found in the F41, resulting in better outdoor visibility. While neither device boasts advanced panel technology like LTPO, the X3 GT’s brighter display provides a more pleasant viewing experience in various lighting conditions. Bezels are comparable, and color accuracy data is unavailable for both, making it difficult to definitively declare a winner based on display quality alone.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume the Poco X3 GT prioritizes camera performance slightly more. The inclusion of features like OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is more likely on the X3 GT, leading to sharper images and more stable videos. The F41 likely relies more on software processing to compensate for hardware limitations. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely inconsequential; its utility is limited by the low resolution and lack of optical image stabilization.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Poco X3 GT’s Mediatek Dimensity 1100, built on a 6nm process, significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy F41’s 10nm Exynos 9611. The Dimensity 1100’s Cortex-A78 cores (2.6 GHz) offer a considerable architectural advantage over the F41’s Cortex-A73 cores (2.3 GHz). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience. The X3 GT also benefits from potentially faster RAM speeds (LPDDR5x is likely, though not explicitly stated), further enhancing performance. The Exynos 9611, while capable, is likely to exhibit more throttling under sustained load due to its less efficient manufacturing process.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 110 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life *despite* the difference in charging speeds. However, the Poco X3 GT’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0, is a massive advantage. A full charge takes only 42 minutes, compared to the F41’s significantly slower 15W charging. This means less downtime and more convenience. While the F41’s potentially more efficient chipset might contribute to slightly longer screen-on time, the X3 GT’s rapid charging effectively mitigates any battery life concerns for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F41 if you prioritize a more balanced power consumption profile and are less concerned with demanding gaming or rapid charging. It’s a solid choice for everyday tasks and media consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 GT if you demand strong performance for gaming, streaming, or multitasking, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 67W charging. It’s the better option for power users and those who frequently find themselves needing a quick top-up.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 9611 in the Galaxy F41 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 9611 is known to throttle under sustained load, meaning performance will decrease over time during extended gaming. While it won't necessarily 'overheat' to the point of being unusable, expect frame rate drops and a warmer device compared to the Poco X3 GT.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Poco X3 GT safe for the battery's long-term health?
Modern smartphones employ sophisticated charging management systems to protect the battery from damage. While 67W is fast, the Poco X3 GT’s charging circuitry regulates the power delivery to ensure battery longevity. It's unlikely to cause significant degradation compared to slower charging methods.
❓ Can the Poco X3 GT run demanding games like PUBG Mobile at 90fps?
The Dimensity 1100 chipset in the Poco X3 GT is capable of running PUBG Mobile at high frame rates. However, achieving a consistent 90fps will depend on the game settings and the device's thermal management. Expect excellent performance, but some settings adjustments may be necessary.
❓ How does the software experience differ between Samsung's One UI and Xiaomi's MIUI on these devices?
Samsung's One UI is generally considered cleaner and more intuitive, while Xiaomi's MIUI is highly customizable but can include pre-installed bloatware. MIUI also tends to be more aggressive with battery optimization, which can sometimes interfere with app functionality.
