The Samsung Galaxy F41 and Realme Narzo 20 Pro represent compelling options in the competitive Indian mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience, they take distinctly different approaches. The F41 prioritizes a balance of features at a lower price point, while the Narzo 20 Pro aggressively targets gamers and power users with its faster charging and more modern chipset.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing value and a balanced experience, the Samsung Galaxy F41 remains a strong contender. However, the Realme Narzo 20 Pro is the clear winner for gamers and those who value incredibly fast charging, justifying the price premium with its superior chipset and charging capabilities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 08. Released 2020, October 16 | 2020, September 21. Released 2020, September 25 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 75.1 x 8.9 mm (6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 162.3 x 75.4 x 9.4 mm (6.39 x 2.97 x 0.37 in) |
| Keyboard | - | QWERTY |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 420 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 9611 (10 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.1 | Android 10, Realme UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Call records | - | 30 dialed, 30 received, 30 missed calls |
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Phonebook | - | 1000 entries, Photocall |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 5 MP, AF |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | - | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML |
| Games | - | Yes |
| Java | - | Yes, MIDP 2.0 |
| Messaging | - | SMS, MMS, Email, IM |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 65W wired |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 400 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 3 h |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fusion Black, Fusion Blue, Fusion Green | White Knight, Black Ninja |
| Models | SM-F415F/DS, SM-F415F | RMX2161 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 170 EUR |
| SAR | 0.38 W/kg (head) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | ₹ 17,490 |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | - | ₹ 15,490 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -89.6dB / Crosstalk -21.0dB |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 77dB / Noise 75dB / Ring 82dB |
Samsung Galaxy F41
- More affordable price point
- Potentially larger battery capacity (unconfirmed)
- Reliable Samsung brand reputation
- Slower charging speed (15W)
- Less powerful chipset (Exynos 9611)
- Likely inferior gaming performance
Realme Narzo 20 Pro
- Blazing-fast 65W charging
- More powerful chipset (Helio G95)
- Superior gaming performance
- Available in multiple RAM/Storage configurations
- Higher price tag
- Potentially shorter battery life due to more powerful processor
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. Both likely utilize AMOLED panels, common in this price bracket, but specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. The focus here isn't on display quality, but rather on the overall package. Bezels are likely comparable, and without specific data, it's difficult to declare a clear winner. The absence of high refresh rate panels on either device suggests a focus on battery life over visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the presence of a main sensor, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Narzo 20 Pro’s chipset likely offers superior image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction. The F41’s Exynos 9611 ISP is older and less sophisticated. The inclusion of a 64GB/128GB RAM option on the Narzo 20 Pro suggests a focus on handling larger image files and more complex processing. The 2MP macro cameras on both devices are likely of limited utility, serving primarily as marketing features.
Performance
The Realme Narzo 20 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm) represents a significant architectural advantage over the Samsung Galaxy F41’s Exynos 9611 (10nm). The G95 utilizes two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz, offering substantially better single-core performance than the F41’s Cortex-A73 cores at 2.3 GHz. While the F41's cores are clocked higher, the A76 architecture is more efficient and powerful. The G95’s 12nm process also allows for better power efficiency. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive gaming experience on the Narzo 20 Pro. The F41 will handle everyday tasks adequately, but will likely struggle with demanding games at higher settings.
Battery Life
The Realme Narzo 20 Pro’s 65W wired charging is the standout feature here. This allows for a full charge in approximately 35 minutes, a massive advantage over the Samsung Galaxy F41’s 15W charging, which will take well over two hours. While the F41 may have a slightly larger battery capacity (spec not provided), the Narzo 20 Pro’s charging speed effectively mitigates any capacity difference. Users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their phone will greatly benefit from the Narzo 20 Pro’s rapid charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F41 if you need a reliable all-rounder with decent performance for everyday tasks and media consumption, and if you're on a tighter budget. Buy the Realme Narzo 20 Pro if you prioritize gaming performance, demand the fastest possible charging speeds, and are willing to spend a bit more for a more future-proof chipset.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 9611 in the Galaxy F41 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 9611 is known to exhibit some thermal throttling under sustained load. While it can handle casual gaming, demanding titles at high settings may lead to noticeable performance drops as the chip heats up. The Narzo 20 Pro’s Helio G95, with its more efficient architecture, is better equipped to handle prolonged gaming without significant throttling.
❓ Is the 65W charging on the Narzo 20 Pro compatible with all chargers and cables?
The Realme Narzo 20 Pro requires a compatible 65W charger and cable (usually included in the box) to achieve its maximum charging speed. Using a standard charger will result in significantly slower charging times. It's recommended to use the provided accessories for optimal performance.
❓ How does the RAM configuration (6GB vs 8GB) on the Narzo 20 Pro affect multitasking?
The 8GB RAM variant of the Narzo 20 Pro will provide a smoother multitasking experience, allowing you to keep more apps open in the background without performance degradation. The 6GB variant is sufficient for most users, but those who frequently switch between many apps or play demanding games may benefit from the extra RAM.
❓ Are the 2MP macro cameras on either phone worth using?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on budget smartphones offer limited image quality. They often lack detail and sharpness. While they can be fun to experiment with, don't expect professional-level macro photography from either device. The main camera will likely produce better results even when zoomed in.
