The Samsung Galaxy F41 and Motorola Moto G9 Plus represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this goal, primarily revolving around chipset choice and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a more efficient processor, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 730G offers a noticeable performance edge over the Galaxy F41’s Exynos 9611, and the 30W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the F41 remains a viable option for those heavily invested in the Samsung ecosystem.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 Brazil |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 08. Released 2020, October 16 | 2020, September 07. Released 2020, September 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.2 x 75.1 x 8.9 mm (6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 170 x 78.1 x 9.7 mm (6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 223 g (7.87 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 420 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 9611 (10 nm) | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.1 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (standard) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Fusion Black, Fusion Blue, Fusion Green | Rose Gold, Indigo Blue |
| Models | SM-F415F/DS, SM-F415F | XT2087-1 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | 0.38 W/kg (head) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 136h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1356:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.0 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 253105 (v8)
GeekBench: 1695 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy F41
- Samsung Brand Recognition
- Potential for Samsung Software Features
- Comparable Battery Endurance
- Less Efficient Exynos 9611 Chipset
- Slower 15W Charging
- Missing Display Brightness Data
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
- More Efficient Snapdragon 730G Chipset
- Faster 30W Charging
- Higher Peak Display Brightness
- Motorola's Software Update History
- Potentially Less Brand Loyalty
Display Comparison
Both devices feature similar contrast ratios at 1356:1, suggesting comparable black levels and overall image depth. However, the Moto G9 Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 522 nits, which, while not exceptional, provides a more visible screen experience outdoors compared to the Galaxy F41, for which brightness data is unavailable. The lack of high refresh rate panels on either device is typical for this price segment, but the G9 Plus’s higher brightness gives it a slight edge in usability.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the market positioning of Motorola often prioritizes computational photography, potentially offering better image processing even with similar hardware. The absence of details regarding Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization, which can be less effective in low-light conditions. The usefulness of a 2MP macro camera on either device is questionable, as image quality is typically limited.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G9 Plus’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (8nm) represents a significant architectural advantage over the Samsung Galaxy F41’s Exynos 9611 (10nm). The 8nm process node inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and sustained performance during demanding tasks. The Snapdragon 730G’s Kryo 470 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, are also more efficient than the Exynos 9611’s Cortex-A73 cores at 2.3 GHz. This means the G9 Plus will likely exhibit less throttling during extended gaming sessions and smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
Both the Samsung Galaxy F41 and Motorola Moto G9 Plus achieve an endurance rating of 136 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the crucial difference lies in charging speed. The Moto G9 Plus supports 30W wired charging, allowing for a significantly faster 0-100% charge time compared to the Galaxy F41’s slower 15W charging. This faster charging capability is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F41 if you prioritize brand familiarity and a potentially wider range of software features within the Samsung ecosystem, and aren't overly concerned with peak performance or rapid charging. Buy the Motorola Moto G9 Plus if you value a more efficient processor for smoother multitasking and gaming, coupled with significantly faster 30W charging that minimizes downtime, making it ideal for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 9611 in the Galaxy F41 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 9611, built on a 10nm process, is more prone to thermal throttling compared to the Snapdragon 730G’s 8nm process. While it can handle casual gaming, extended sessions with graphically demanding titles may result in noticeable performance drops as the chip heats up.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge the Motorola Moto G9 Plus with the 30W charger?
While a precise time isn't available, the Moto G9 Plus’s 30W charging capability should deliver a full charge in approximately 60-75 minutes, significantly faster than the Galaxy F41’s 15W charging, which would likely take over 2 hours.
❓ Is the difference in processor performance between the Snapdragon 730G and Exynos 9611 noticeable in everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing and social media, the difference may be minimal. However, when multitasking, opening demanding apps, or playing games, the Snapdragon 730G’s superior efficiency and architecture will provide a smoother and more responsive experience.
❓ Does either phone support VoLTE/VoWiFi on all carriers?
Carrier compatibility can vary. It's crucial to check with your specific carrier to confirm VoLTE and VoWiFi support for both the Samsung Galaxy F41 and Motorola Moto G9 Plus before purchasing, as regional variations exist.
