Samsung Galaxy F36 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and all-day battery life, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the stronger contender. Its 68W charging and impressive 10:28h active use score outweigh the Galaxy F36’s brand appeal and slightly different processor architecture.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F36 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 21 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 29 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), plastic frame, silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 77.9 x 7.7 mm (6.47 x 3.07 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 109.1 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Luxe Violet, Coral Red, Onyx Black | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | SM-E366B, SM-E366B/DS | XT2307-1 |
| Price | ₹ 16,999 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 0.46 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.38 W/kg (head) 1.01 W/kg (body) | - |
Samsung Galaxy F36
- Established Samsung brand and ecosystem
- Potentially optimized software experience
- 5nm Exynos 1380 offers good efficiency
- Slower 25W charging
- Limited battery life data
- Display brightness likely lower than Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- 68W fast charging (50% in 15 min)
- Excellent 10:28h active use battery life
- Brighter 1073 nit display
- MediaTek chipset may not have the same brand recognition
- Camera details are limited
- Software updates may be less frequent than Samsung
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This is a significant advantage for outdoor visibility compared to the Galaxy F36, for which display brightness data is unavailable. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Neo’s higher peak brightness suggests a superior viewing experience in bright conditions. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests standard refresh rate management, potentially impacting battery life during dynamic content viewing.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by limited data. Both devices are expected to feature multi-camera systems, but specifics beyond 'Photo / Video' for the Edge 40 Neo are missing. The absence of sensor size or aperture information makes a direct comparison difficult. It’s reasonable to assume both will include a primary wide-angle lens, but the quality of image processing and low-light performance will be key differentiators. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing feature with limited practical benefit.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030, fabricated on a 6nm process, holds a slight architectural edge over the Samsung Galaxy F36’s 5nm Exynos 1380. While both CPUs feature an octa-core configuration with 2x Cortex-A78 performance cores, the Dimensity 7030’s more efficient node and potentially optimized core clock speeds (2.5GHz vs 2.4GHz) could translate to better sustained performance and thermal management. The F36’s 5nm process *should* offer better efficiency, but the Dimensity 7030’s architecture appears to compensate. The impact on real-world tasks will depend on software optimization.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the battery and charging department. Its 10:28h active use score demonstrates excellent endurance, and the 68W wired charging capability is a game-changer, promising a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The Galaxy F36, limited to 25W charging, will take considerably longer to replenish its battery. While the F36’s battery capacity is unknown, the Neo’s combination of efficiency and fast charging provides a clear advantage for users who prioritize minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F36 if you prioritize the Samsung ecosystem, a familiar user interface, and are less concerned with extremely fast charging. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value rapid charging, extended battery life, and a more efficient chipset for demanding tasks, all at a potentially lower price point.