Samsung Galaxy F34 vs M34 5G: A Tale of Two Identical Twins

Samsung frequently releases near-identical phones under different model numbers, targeting varying retail channels and promotions. The Galaxy F34 and M34 5G are prime examples, both powered by the Exynos 1280 chipset and featuring 25W charging. This comparison dissects the nuances between these devices to help you determine which, if either, is the right choice.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user, the Samsung Galaxy M34 5G emerges as the slightly better value. While both phones offer identical performance thanks to the Exynos 1280, the M34 5G's broader availability and potentially more aggressive pricing make it the more accessible option.

PHONES
Phone Names	Samsung Galaxy F34	Samsung Galaxy M34 5G

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66
5G bands	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G

Launch
Announced	2023, August 07	2023, July 03
Status	Available. Released 2023, August 12	Available. Released 2023, July 15

Body
Dimensions	161.7 x 77.2 x 8.8 mm (6.37 x 3.04 x 0.35 in)	161.7 x 77.2 x 8.8 mm (6.37 x 3.04 x 0.35 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	208 g (7.34 oz)	208 g (7.34 oz)

Display
Protection	Corning Gorilla Glass 5	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density)	1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density)
Size	6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio)	6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak)	Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)	Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Exynos 1280 (5 nm)	Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
GPU	Mali-G68	Mali-G68
OS	Android 13, One UI 5.1	Android 13, upgradable to Android 16, One UI 8

Memory
Card slot	microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)	microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal	128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM	128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM

Main Camera
Features	LED flash, panorama, HDR	LED flash, panorama, HDR
Triple	50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4	50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP, f/2.4
Video	4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps	4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps

Selfie camera
Single	13 MP, f/2.2, (wide)	13 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30fps

Sound
35mm jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes

Comms
Bluetooth	5.3, A2DP, LE	5.3, A2DP, LE
NFC	Yes	Yes
Positioning	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Radio	Unspecified	FM radio
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass

Battery
Charging	25W wired	25W wired
Type	Li-Po 6000 mAh	Li-Po 6000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Electric Black, Mystic Green	Midnight Blue, Prism Silver, Waterfall Blue
Models	SM-E346B, SM-E346B/DS	SM-M346B, SM-M346B/DS, SM-M346B1, SM-M346B1/DS
Price	About 210 EUR	About 190 EUR
SAR	0.89 W/kg (head)	0.89 W/kg (head)

Samsung Galaxy F34

Identical performance to M34 5G due to Exynos 1280
Potential for exclusive retailer discounts
Reliable Samsung software experience

Potentially limited availability
May receive less consistent software updates

Samsung Galaxy M34 5G

Wider retail availability
Likely better long-term software support
Consistent Samsung experience

Identical performance to F34, offering no inherent advantage
May be slightly more expensive depending on promotions

Display Comparison

Both the Galaxy F34 and M34 5G are expected to feature similar Super AMOLED displays, though specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage aren't provided. Given their market segment, we anticipate around 400-500 nits of typical brightness. The absence of LTPO technology suggests a standard 60Hz or 90Hz refresh rate, impacting smoothness during scrolling and gaming. Bezels are likely to be comparable, prioritizing screen real estate within a budget-friendly design.

Camera Comparison

While megapixel counts are not provided in the context data, both phones likely feature a multi-camera system with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. The image processing algorithms will be similar, focusing on Samsung's signature vibrant color profile. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is a likely cost-saving measure, potentially resulting in softer images and less stable video recording in low-light conditions. The 2MP macro camera, common in this price range, offers limited utility due to its low resolution and fixed focus.

Performance

The heart of both devices is the Exynos 1280 (5nm). This octa-core processor, with its 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, delivers comparable performance in everyday tasks and moderate gaming. The 5nm fabrication process is crucial, offering a balance between power efficiency and performance. However, sustained workloads could lead to thermal throttling, potentially impacting frame rates in demanding games. RAM configuration (likely 6GB or 8GB LPDDR4x) will also influence multitasking capabilities, but the chipset remains the primary performance bottleneck.

Battery Life

Both devices utilize 25W wired charging, suggesting similar 0-100% charging times (around 1.5-2 hours). Battery capacity is not specified, but we can expect around 6000mAh, a common size for Samsung's M and F series. The Exynos 1280's 5nm process contributes to reasonable power efficiency, potentially delivering all-day battery life for moderate users. However, heavy gaming or prolonged video streaming will deplete the battery faster.

Buying Guide

Buy the Samsung Galaxy F34 if you find it at a significantly lower price through a specific retailer, as the core hardware is identical to the M34 5G. Buy the Samsung Galaxy M34 5G if you prioritize wider availability, potential for better long-term software support, and a more consistent retail experience. Both are excellent choices for users seeking a reliable 5G experience without breaking the bank.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Exynos 1280 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions on either the F34 or M34 5G?

The Exynos 1280, while efficient, can experience thermal throttling during extended gaming. Expect some frame rate drops after 30-45 minutes of demanding titles. Neither phone features advanced cooling solutions, so managing expectations is key. Lowering graphics settings can mitigate this.

❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either device worth using?

The 2MP macro camera is primarily included for marketing purposes. Its low resolution and fixed focus limit its usefulness. While it can capture close-up shots, the image quality is significantly lower than the main sensor, making it a less desirable option for serious photography.

❓ Does either the Galaxy F34 or M34 5G support 90fps gameplay in PUBG Mobile?

While the Exynos 1280 is capable of handling PUBG Mobile, achieving a consistent 90fps frame rate is unlikely, even with graphics settings lowered. The chipset and display (likely 60Hz or 90Hz) may struggle to maintain that frame rate consistently, especially during intense firefights.

❓ What type of storage does each phone use, and is it expandable?

Both devices likely utilize UFS 2.2 storage, a common standard in this price range. They both include a dedicated microSD card slot for expandable storage, allowing users to increase the internal capacity as needed.