The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Samsung Galaxy F23 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will break down every aspect, helping you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 edges out the Galaxy F23 thanks to its superior battery life, faster charging, and brighter display. While the F23 boasts a slightly more powerful chipset, the Redmi Note 12's overall package delivers a more well-rounded experience for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 08 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 16 | Available. Released 2023, January 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 165.5 x 77 x 8.4 mm (6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 165.9 x 76.2 x 8 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM4375 Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 | Android 12, MIUI 14 (International), MIUI 13 (India) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@480fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual Proximity Sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 33W wired, 50% in 22 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aqua Blue, Forest Green | Frosted Green, Matte Black, Mystique Blue |
| Models | SM-E236B, SM-E236B/DS | 22111317I, 22111317G |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 151.99 / $ 219.99 / ₹ 11,999 |
| SAR | 1.24 W/kg (head) | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.91 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 101h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.0 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 360745 (v9)
GeekBench: 1998 (v5.1), 2017 (v6) |
Samsung Galaxy F23
- More powerful chipset (Snapdragon 750G)
- Samsung ecosystem integration
- Likely good camera processing
- Shorter battery life
- Slower charging (25W)
- Less bright display
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12
- Exceptional battery life
- Fast charging (33W)
- Brighter display
- Competitive price
- Less powerful chipset (Snapdragon 4 Gen 1)
- Xiaomi's MIUI software (can be polarizing)
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 706 nits, offering better outdoor visibility. Its infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors. The Galaxy F23's display is likely good, but lacks the quantifiable brightness advantage of the Redmi Note 12. Both likely use AMOLED panels, offering rich colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective and depends on individual preferences. Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed comparisons require more in-depth testing. The Galaxy F23 likely benefits from Samsung's image processing, while the Redmi Note 12 may offer a more natural look. Both likely have a main sensor, ultrawide, and macro lens.
Performance
The Galaxy F23's Snapdragon 750G chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Redmi Note 12's Snapdragon 4 Gen 1. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the F23. However, the Redmi Note 12's 6nm process may offer slightly better efficiency.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 absolutely dominates in the battery department. Its endurance rating of 101h is exceptional, and active use lasting 10:58h is impressive. The Galaxy F23's battery life is likely decent, but falls short of the Redmi Note 12's longevity.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy F23 is ideal for users prioritizing performance and a Samsung ecosystem experience. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 is a great choice for those seeking exceptional battery life, fast charging, and a vibrant display, all at a competitive price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Samsung Galaxy F23 is the better choice for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 750G chipset.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 12 have fast charging?
Yes, the Redmi Note 12 supports 33W fast charging, allowing it to reach 50% charge in just 22 minutes.
❓ Which phone has a better camera?
It's difficult to definitively say. Both phones have capable cameras, but detailed comparisons are needed to determine which produces better images in various conditions.
