Samsung Galaxy F23 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G emerges as the winner. Its 67W charging significantly outperforms the F23’s 25W, and the 746 nit display offers a more vibrant viewing experience. However, the F23 remains a viable option for those seeking a slightly different chipset.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F23 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 08 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 16 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.5 x 77 x 8.4 mm (6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@480fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Virtual Proximity Sensing | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Aqua Blue, Forest Green | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | SM-E236B, SM-E236B/DS | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | 1.24 W/kg (head) | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy F23
- Potentially more stable software experience (Samsung)
- Snapdragon 750G offers decent 5G performance
- Competitive price point
- Slow 25W charging
- Display brightness likely lower than Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Limited detailed specifications available
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Blazing-fast 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3.0
- Brighter 746 nit display for outdoor visibility
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
- Potential for bloatware
- Camera performance relies heavily on software processing
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 746 nits, compared to the Galaxy F23 which lacks published brightness data. This difference translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays likely utilize LCD technology given their price points, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. Contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal) for the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, typical for LCDs, but the lack of detailed display specs for the F23 makes a direct comparison difficult. Bezels are assumed to be similar, given the market segment.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are equipped with photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are missing. Without sensor size or aperture information, a meaningful comparison is challenging. It’s reasonable to assume both phones feature a primary camera, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s brand reputation suggests a more refined image processing pipeline and potentially better low-light performance. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses in this segment suggests both phones likely include one, but these are generally of limited practical use.
Performance
Both devices utilize Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets, but differ in generation and manufacturing process. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features the Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the Galaxy F23 uses the Snapdragon 750G 5G (8nm). The 6nm process of the 695 generally offers better power efficiency, potentially leading to longer battery life under sustained loads. The CPU configurations are similar – both octa-core with 2x2.2 GHz performance cores – but the Snapdragon 695 utilizes Kryo 660 Gold cores, a newer architecture than the F23’s Kryo 570. This suggests a slight edge in single-core performance for the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. The F23’s 8nm process *could* offer a slight advantage in peak performance, but the 695’s architectural improvements and efficiency likely offset this.
Battery Life
Both the Samsung Galaxy F23 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G supports 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3.0, achieving 50% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes. The Galaxy F23 is limited to 25W wired charging, resulting in a significantly longer charging time. This difference is crucial for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F23 if you prioritize a potentially more stable software experience within the Samsung ecosystem and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you value blazing-fast 67W charging, a brighter and more visible display in sunlight, and a more aggressive price point. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is the better choice for power users and those who frequently top up their phones throughout the day.