Samsung Galaxy F23 vs Galaxy F14: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy F14 edges out the F23 thanks to its more efficient 5nm Exynos 1330 chipset, resulting in better performance and potentially improved battery life. While the F23's Snapdragon 750G is capable, the F14 offers a more modern and efficient experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F23 | Samsung Galaxy F14 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-А, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 08 | 2023, March 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 16 | Available. Released 2023, March 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.5 x 77 x 8.4 mm (6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 166.8 x 77.2 x 9.4 mm (6.57 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz | PLS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MP2 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 | Android 13, One UI Core 5.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@480fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual Proximity Sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Aqua Blue, Forest Green | Black, Green, Purple |
| Models | SM-E236B, SM-E236B/DS | SM-E146B, SM-E146B/DS |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | 1.24 W/kg (head) | 0.69 W/kg (head) |
Samsung Galaxy F23
- Established Snapdragon chipset
- Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on main camera
- Good value for money
- Less efficient chipset
- Older processor technology
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to F14
Samsung Galaxy F14
- More efficient 5nm Exynos 1330 chipset
- Better performance and multitasking
- Potentially longer battery life
- Slightly improved color accuracy
- No OIS on main camera
- Less established chipset compared to Snapdragon
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.6-inch FHD+ display with a 90Hz refresh rate, offering a smooth visual experience. The F14 might have slightly better color accuracy due to the newer Exynos chipset's improved ISP, but the difference is likely minimal. Both use a PLS LCD panel, so don't expect OLED quality.
Camera Comparison
The F23 typically features a 50MP main camera with OIS, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 2MP macro lens. The F14 boasts a 50MP main camera, a 2MP macro, and a 2MP depth sensor. While megapixels aren't everything, the F23's OIS provides better stability in low-light conditions and smoother video recording. Image processing quality is generally comparable, with Samsung's software doing most of the heavy lifting.
Performance
This is where the F14 shines. The Exynos 1330 (5nm) generally outperforms the Snapdragon 750G (8nm) in both CPU and GPU benchmarks. Expect smoother app loading, better multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the F14. The F23's Snapdragon is still capable, but the F14 has a noticeable advantage.
Battery Life
Both phones have a 6000mAh battery, promising excellent battery life. However, the F14's more efficient 5nm Exynos 1330 chipset should translate to slightly better real-world battery performance compared to the F23's 8nm Snapdragon 750G. Expect a full day of moderate to heavy use on both devices.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy F23 is ideal for users who prioritize a slightly more established chipset and are comfortable with potentially slightly less efficient power consumption. The Galaxy F14 is a better choice for those seeking the latest processor technology, improved efficiency, and a smoother overall experience, especially for multitasking and demanding apps.