The Samsung Galaxy F23 and A23 are both excellent contenders in the budget smartphone market. Both offer compelling features at an affordable price, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their key differences to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy F23 edges out the A23 thanks to its superior Snapdragon 750G chipset, offering noticeably better performance for gaming and multitasking. While the A23 boasts impressive battery life, the F23's faster processor makes it the more well-rounded choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 08 | 2022, March 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 16 | Available. Released 2022, March 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.5 x 77 x 8.4 mm (6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | TFT LCD, 120Hz | PLS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, 720p@480fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | Virtual Proximity Sensing | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aqua Blue, Forest Green | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | SM-E236B, SM-E236B/DS | SM-A235F, SM-A235F/DS, SM-A235F/DSN, SM-A235M, SM-A235M/DS, SM-A235N |
| Price | About 190 EUR | £ 99.00 / ₹ 14,999 |
| SAR | 1.24 W/kg (head) | 0.48 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.36 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 130h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1241:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 273554 (v9)
GeekBench: 1632 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.7fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy F23
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 750G)
- Smooth 120Hz Display
- 5G Connectivity
- Good Value for Money
- Slightly Lower Display Brightness
- Charging Speed Could Be Faster
Samsung Galaxy A23
- Exceptional Battery Life
- Excellent Contrast Ratio Display
- Optical Image Stabilization (OIS)
- 4G Connectivity
- Less Powerful Processor
- Slower Performance
- No 5G
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.6-inch FHD+ display with a 120Hz refresh rate, providing a smooth visual experience. The A23's contrast ratio of 1241:1 is excellent, delivering rich colors and deep blacks. While the F23's brightness is slightly lower (around 464 nits), both displays are perfectly adequate for everyday use and outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a triple-camera setup. The A23 typically has a 50MP main sensor with OIS, while the F23 also has a 50MP main sensor. Image quality is generally comparable in good lighting conditions, but the A23's OIS provides better stability in low light. Video recording capabilities are similar on both devices.
Performance
This is where the F23 truly shines. Its Snapdragon 750G chipset is significantly more powerful than the A23's Snapdragon 680. Expect faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the F23. The A23 handles basic tasks well, but struggles with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A23 excels in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 130 hours. The F23's battery life is still good, but not quite as exceptional. Both phones support 25W wired charging, but charging speeds are similar across both devices.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy F23 is ideal for users who prioritize performance and smoother multitasking, especially those who enjoy mobile gaming. The Galaxy A23 is a great pick for users who value exceptional battery life and a vibrant display, and are less concerned about raw processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Galaxy F23 worth the extra money over the A23?
If performance is a priority, then yes. The F23's faster processor makes a noticeable difference in everyday use and gaming. If battery life is your main concern, the A23 is a strong contender.
❓ Does the Galaxy A23 support 5G?
No, the Galaxy A23 is a 4G-only device. The Galaxy F23 supports 5G connectivity.
