The Samsung Galaxy F22 and M32 represent Samsung’s continued push in the competitive budget smartphone market. Both devices share a core foundation – the Mediatek Helio G80 chipset – but diverge significantly in charging capabilities, particularly based on regional availability. This comparison dissects these differences and helps you determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy M32 (International version) is the superior choice due to its 25W fast charging, which significantly reduces charging times compared to the F22’s 15W charging. While performance is identical, the convenience of faster charging outweighs the minor price differences.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 06 | 2021, June 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 13 | Available. Released 2021, June 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160 x 74 x 9.4 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.37 in) | 159.3 x 74 x 8.4 mm (Global) or 9.3 mm (India) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 180 g (Global) / 196 g (India) (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~274 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 600 nits (HDR) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI core 5.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | Virtual Proximity Sensing | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 25W wired (International)
15W wired (India) |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Ion 5000 mAh (Global)· Li-Ion 6000 mAh (India only) |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Denim Black, Denim Blue | Black, Light Blue |
| Models | SM-E225F, SM-E225F/DS | SM-M325FV, SM-M325FV/DS, SM-M325F/DS, SM-M325F |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 180 EUR |
| SAR | 0.62 W/kg (head) | 0.64 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 1.57 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy F22
- Potentially lower price point
- Identical performance to M32 (Helio G80)
- Likely similar camera capabilities
- Slower 15W charging
- May lack features found in the M32 (depending on region)
- Potentially less future-proof due to slower charging
Samsung Galaxy M32
- 25W fast charging (International version)
- Faster charging significantly improves convenience
- Potentially better software support (depending on region)
- May be slightly more expensive than the F22
- 15W charging in India negates the charging advantage
- Identical performance to F22 (Helio G80)
Display Comparison
Both the Galaxy F22 and M32 feature displays that are adequate for their price point, but detailed specifications are missing. Given their market positioning, we can assume both utilize LCD panels. The absence of high refresh rates is expected. The user experience will likely be similar, with color accuracy and brightness being key differentiators that require hands-on testing. Bezels are likely comparable, focusing on maximizing screen real estate within the budget constraints.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance will likely be similar, relying heavily on Samsung’s image processing algorithms. Both phones likely feature a primary camera, an ultrawide, and depth/macro sensors. However, detailed sensor specifications are missing. The quality of the primary sensor and its aperture will be the most significant factor in image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing feature with limited practical utility.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Mediatek Helio G80 (MT6769V/CU) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means identical CPU performance for everyday tasks and gaming. The 12nm process node suggests moderate thermal efficiency; sustained gaming may lead to some throttling, but performance will be consistent across both models. RAM configurations are likely similar, impacting multitasking capabilities, but the chipset remains the primary performance bottleneck.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn’t specified, both phones likely house batteries in the 5000mAh range, typical for this segment. The critical difference lies in charging speed. The Galaxy F22 is limited to 15W wired charging, resulting in a longer 0-100% charge time. The Galaxy M32, in international markets, supports 25W wired charging, significantly reducing charging times. In India, the M32 is also limited to 15W, negating this advantage. This charging disparity directly impacts user convenience and is a key deciding factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F22 if you prioritize a slightly lower initial cost and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid option for users who don’t heavily rely on quick top-ups. Buy the Samsung Galaxy M32 if you value faster charging, especially if you’re a heavy smartphone user who frequently needs to replenish battery life quickly. The 25W charging (available in international markets) is a game-changer for convenience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Helio G80 in either phone struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Helio G80 is a capable chipset for casual gaming, but demanding titles like PUBG and Call of Duty may require reduced graphics settings for smooth gameplay. Both the F22 and M32 will offer a similar gaming experience, with potential for some frame drops during intense scenes due to thermal throttling.
❓ Is the 25W charging on the international Samsung Galaxy M32 significantly faster than the 15W charging on the F22?
Yes, the 25W charging on the international M32 is considerably faster. Expect a full charge in approximately 1 hour 30 minutes to 2 hours, compared to 2.5 to 3 hours for the F22 with its 15W charger. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Which phone is better for users in India, considering the M32 also has a 15W charging variant?
In India, where both the F22 and M32 are limited to 15W charging, the decision comes down to price and any other minor feature differences. The F22 is likely the more affordable option, making it a sensible choice if budget is the primary concern. Otherwise, any other preference in design or software features should be the deciding factor.
