Samsung's A and F series represent their aggressive push into the budget and mid-range smartphone markets. The Galaxy F22 and A22, while sharing a similar price bracket, cater to slightly different priorities. Both are powered by the Mediatek Helio G80, but subtle differences in display characteristics and established endurance ratings make choosing between them a nuanced decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a consistently brighter viewing experience and proven battery longevity, the Samsung Galaxy A22 emerges as the slightly better choice. While the F22 offers comparable performance, the A22’s 597 nits of brightness and 121-hour endurance rating provide a more reliable daily experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 06 | 2021, June 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 13 | Available. Released 2021, July 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160 x 74 x 9.4 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.37 in) | 159.3 x 73.6 x 8.4 mm (6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~274 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~274 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 600 nits (HDR) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 600 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI core 5.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | Virtual Proximity Sensing | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Denim Black, Denim Blue | Black, White, Mint, Violet |
| Models | SM-E225F, SM-E225F/DS | SM-A225F, SM-A225F/DS, SM-A225M, SM-A225M/DS |
| Price | About 170 EUR | € 193.97 / £ 160.00 |
| SAR | 0.62 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 121h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.6 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 185358 (v8), 165959 (v9)
GeekBench: 5464 (v4.4), 1372 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy F22
- Potentially lower price point for value-conscious buyers.
- Identical processing power to the A22 for everyday tasks.
- Shares the same 15W charging standard as the A22.
- Unspecified display brightness may result in poor outdoor visibility.
- Lacks a documented endurance rating, making battery life uncertain.
Samsung Galaxy A22
- 597 nits peak brightness ensures excellent visibility in all conditions.
- 121-hour endurance rating provides confidence in all-day battery life.
- Established track record and user reviews for reliability.
- May be slightly more expensive than the F22.
- Shares the same 15W charging as the F22, not the fastest available.
Display Comparison
Both the Galaxy F22 and A22 lack detailed display specifications beyond the A22’s measured 597 nits of peak brightness. This is a significant advantage for the A22, as it translates to better visibility in outdoor conditions. While both feature an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (a marketing term indicating deep blacks on an AMOLED panel), the F22’s brightness remains unspecified, suggesting it may not reach the same levels. This difference impacts readability and overall visual experience, particularly for users who frequently use their phones outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing algorithms. This makes a direct camera comparison impossible based on the provided data. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is likely a marketing feature with limited practical utility, as image quality from such sensors is typically subpar. Without further information, it's safe to assume camera performance will be similar, relying heavily on software processing to enhance image quality.
Performance
The core performance of both devices is identical, stemming from the Mediatek Helio G80 (12 nm) chipset and its octa-core CPU configuration (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). This means users can expect similar performance in everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. The absence of information regarding RAM speed (LPDDR4X is likely) and storage type (eMMC vs. UFS) prevents a deeper analysis of potential performance bottlenecks. Thermal management is also unaddressed, but the Helio G80 is generally known for reasonable efficiency, minimizing the risk of significant throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A22 boasts a documented endurance rating of 121 hours, a valuable metric indicating real-world battery life under typical usage. The F22 lacks this rating, making it difficult to assess its battery performance relative to the A22. Both devices share the same 15W wired charging capability, suggesting similar charging times from 0-100%. The A22’s established endurance rating provides confidence in its ability to last a full day on a single charge, while the F22’s battery life remains an unknown quantity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F22 if you prioritize maximizing value and are comfortable with potentially lower peak brightness. It's a solid option for users who primarily consume content indoors and aren't heavily reliant on display clarity in direct sunlight. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A22 if you value a brighter, more visible display for outdoor use and appreciate the reassurance of a well-documented 121-hour endurance rating, indicating consistent battery performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Helio G80 in either phone struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Helio G80 is a capable processor for casual gaming, but it's not designed for consistently high frame rates in graphically intensive titles like PUBG or Call of Duty. Expect to play on medium settings to maintain a stable experience. Both phones will likely exhibit similar performance in gaming due to the identical chipset.
❓ Is the 15W charging speed sufficient, or will it take a long time to fully charge the battery?
15W charging is relatively slow by today's standards. Expect a full charge from 0-100% to take approximately 2-3 hours. While not ideal for users who need a quick top-up, it's adequate for overnight charging. The A22's longer endurance rating may mitigate the slower charging speed, as you'll likely need to charge it less frequently.
❓ Are there any significant software differences between the Galaxy F22 and A22?
Both devices run Samsung's One UI, but the F22 may receive software updates slightly later than the A22. Samsung typically prioritizes updates for its A-series devices. However, both phones should receive a similar level of software support and security patches.
