Poco X6 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy F17: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its significantly faster 67W charging, brighter 1148 nit display, and more powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset provide a superior user experience, especially for media consumption and gaming. However, Samsung loyalists may prefer the F17’s brand recognition.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F17 | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 26, 28, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 11 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 14 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 77.9 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 3.07 x 0.30 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 1100 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF, OIS 5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Violet | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | SM-E176B/DS | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | ₹ 12,914 | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR | 0.64 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy F17
- Established Samsung brand reputation
- Potentially better software optimization and updates
- Efficient Exynos 1330 chipset for everyday tasks
- Slower 25W charging
- Likely dimmer display compared to Poco X6 Pro
- Less powerful chipset for demanding applications
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- Brighter 1148 nit display for outdoor visibility
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Superior gaming performance
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
- Brand recognition not as strong as Samsung
- Potential for more bloatware
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a substantial advantage in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1148 nits. This is a significant leap over what we’d expect from the F17, making the X6 Pro far more usable outdoors. While the F17’s panel specifics are unknown, it’s unlikely to match the X6 Pro’s brightness. The X6 Pro’s higher brightness translates to better HDR content visibility and a more immersive viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for optimal power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Galaxy F17, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Poco X6 Pro likely holds an edge due to its more advanced chipset’s image signal processor (ISP). The ISP handles image processing, and the Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s ISP is expected to deliver superior noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality. While both phones likely feature standard photo and video modes, the X6 Pro’s processing power allows for more sophisticated computational photography features. We can assume both phones will include a standard macro lens, but these 2MP sensors are generally of limited utility.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra in the Poco X6 Pro is the clear performance champion. Built on a 4nm process, it features a unique CPU configuration – 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – offering a substantial uplift over the Samsung Galaxy F17’s Exynos 1330 (5nm). The Exynos 1330’s octa-core setup (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is competent, but the Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s more modern architecture and higher clock speeds will result in noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The 4nm node of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 45 minutes with support for QC2.0 and PD3.0. This is significantly faster than the Samsung Galaxy F17’s 25W charging. While the X6 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its active use score of 11:46h demonstrates excellent battery life. The faster charging speed mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery capacity, offering a more convenient user experience. The F17’s 25W charging, while adequate, feels comparatively slow in today’s market.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F17 if you prioritize a familiar user interface, a trusted brand with a strong software support record, and moderate performance for everyday tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you demand faster charging, a brighter and more vibrant display, and significantly more processing power for gaming and demanding applications. The X6 Pro is the clear choice for power users.