Realme 12 Pro+ vs Samsung Galaxy F17: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 12 Pro+ emerges as the stronger contender. Its significantly faster 67W charging and brighter 802 nit display offer tangible benefits in daily use. While the Exynos 1330 in the F17 may offer slightly better sustained performance due to thermal headroom, the Realme’s overall package is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F17 | Realme 12 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 26, 28, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 11 | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 14 | Available. Released 2024, January 29 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 77.9 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 3.07 x 0.30 in) | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 1100 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF, OIS 5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Violet | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red |
| Models | SM-E176B/DS | RMX3840, RMX3841 |
| Price | ₹ 12,914 | $ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400 |
| SAR | 0.64 W/kg (head) | - |
Samsung Galaxy F17
- Potentially better sustained performance due to Exynos thermal management
- Samsung’s established software ecosystem
- Reliable brand reputation
- Slower 25W charging
- Likely dimmer display compared to Realme
- Less powerful GPU
Realme 12 Pro+
- Blazing-fast 67W charging (50% in 19 min)
- Brighter 802 nit display
- More efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset
- May run warmer under sustained load
- Realme’s software can be polarizing
- Long-term software support may be shorter than Samsung
Display Comparison
The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 802 nits, compared to an unstated brightness for the Galaxy F17. This translates to superior visibility outdoors. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Realme’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. We lack PWM frequency data for both, but the Realme’s brightness advantage will be more noticeable in direct sunlight. Bezels are expected to be similar, given the market segment, but the Realme’s display is the clear winner in terms of raw brightness.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, Realme typically focuses on high megapixel counts, and the 'Pro+' designation suggests a more advanced camera system. The Galaxy F17’s camera performance will likely be solid, leveraging Samsung’s image processing expertise, but the Realme 12 Pro+ is likely to offer more versatility and potentially better low-light performance. We can assume both phones will have a standard suite of lenses, but the Realme’s sensor size and aperture are likely to be larger, capturing more light.
Performance
Both phones employ octa-core CPUs with a similar core configuration – four Cortex-A78 cores and four Cortex-A55 cores. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ utilizes the Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm), while the Galaxy F17 features the Samsung Exynos 1330 (5nm). The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon generally offers better power efficiency and thermal characteristics than the 5nm Exynos. While clock speeds are comparable (2.4GHz A78 on both), the Snapdragon’s Adreno GPU is likely to provide a more substantial graphics performance boost. The Exynos 1330 might maintain higher sustained performance due to better thermal management, but the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 offers a more powerful peak experience.
Battery Life
The Realme 12 Pro+ shines in the battery and charging department. It supports 67W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in just 19 minutes – a significant advantage over the Galaxy F17’s 25W charging. While the Galaxy F17’s battery capacity is unknown, the Realme 12 Pro+ delivers an impressive 13:24h of active use. The faster charging speed of the Realme is a game-changer for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly, offsetting any potential capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F17 if you prioritize a potentially cooler running device during extended gaming sessions and value Samsung’s software ecosystem. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you demand faster charging, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a more modern feature set, even if it means potentially slightly warmer temperatures under heavy load.