Poco X6 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy F15: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset, coupled with 67W fast charging, delivers a noticeably smoother experience and quicker top-ups. However, the Galaxy F15 remains a viable option for those prioritizing extreme affordability and a more established brand.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F15 | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 04 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 11 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 160.1 x 76.8 x 9.3 mm (6.30 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 217 g (7.65 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 90Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, One UI 6 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF 5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Ash Black, Groovy Violet, Jazzy Green | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | SM-E156B, SM-E156B/DS | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | ₹ 15,490 | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR | 0.71 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy F15
- More affordable price point
- Established Samsung brand reputation
- Potentially longer software support
- Significantly weaker processor
- Slower charging speed
- Likely less vibrant display
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Much faster and more efficient processor
- Faster 67W charging with QC/PD support
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Higher price tag
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
- Potentially less long-term software support compared to Samsung
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the Galaxy F15, whose brightness is not specified but is likely lower given its positioning. While both likely utilize LCD panels (based on market segment), the X6 Pro’s higher brightness is a clear advantage. The absence of information on refresh rates or panel technology (LTPO) for the F15 suggests a more basic display experience.
Camera Comparison
While both phones feature cameras, the context data is limited. The Poco X6 Pro likely features a more sophisticated camera system, given its higher price point and Xiaomi’s focus on camera technology. We can infer that the X6 Pro will offer better image processing and potentially larger sensor sizes. The Galaxy F15’s camera is likely adequate for casual photography, but will likely fall short in low-light conditions and detail capture. The absence of sensor size details for either phone makes a precise comparison difficult, but the X6 Pro’s overall positioning suggests a more capable camera experience.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Poco X6 Pro’s MediaTek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) is a powerhouse, featuring a 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 core and three additional Cortex-A715 cores, alongside four Cortex-A510 cores. This contrasts sharply with the Galaxy F15’s Dimensity 6100+ (6nm), which uses older Cortex-A76 and A55 cores. The 4nm process of the X6 Pro’s chip also offers better power efficiency, reducing thermal throttling during sustained workloads. This means the X6 Pro will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease and consistency.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 11:46h. While the Galaxy F15’s battery capacity is not specified, the X6 Pro’s superior efficiency, combined with its 67W fast charging (capable of 100% charge in 45 minutes with QC2.0 and PD3.0 support), provides a significant convenience factor. The F15’s 25W charging is considerably slower, requiring more downtime to replenish the battery. The X6 Pro’s faster charging is particularly beneficial for users who frequently use power-intensive applications.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F15 if you need a reliable, everyday smartphone with a focus on affordability and long-term software support. It's ideal for users who primarily browse, use social media, and make occasional calls. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prioritize gaming, demanding multitasking, and fast charging. This phone is geared towards power users who want a responsive experience and don't mind a less-known brand.