Samsung Galaxy F14 vs Motorola Moto G84: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a potentially smoother software experience, the Samsung Galaxy F14 emerges as the winner. Its Exynos 1330, built on a 5nm process, offers a performance edge over the Moto G84’s 6nm Snapdragon 695, despite the latter’s slightly faster charging. However, the Moto G84’s exceptional battery life is a strong counterpoint.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F14 | Motorola Moto G84 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - LATAM |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - LATAM |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 26, 28, 40, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - LATAM |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-А, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 24 | 2023, August 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 30 | Available. Released 2023, September 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 166.8 x 77.2 x 9.4 mm (6.57 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) | 160 x 74.4 x 7.6 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 166.8 g (5.86 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~81.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 90Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13, One UI Core 5.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Purple | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue, Viva Magenta |
| Models | SM-E146B, SM-E146B/DS | XT2347, XT2347-1, XT2347-2 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | $ 399.00 / £ 189.99 / € 169.00 |
| SAR | 0.69 W/kg (head) | - |
Samsung Galaxy F14
- Potentially better sustained performance due to 5nm Exynos 1330
- Samsung ecosystem integration
- Likely smoother multitasking experience
- Slower 25W charging
- Display brightness not specified, potentially lower than Moto G84
- Battery life details missing
Motorola Moto G84
- Exceptional battery life (12:31h active use, 117h endurance)
- Faster 30W charging
- Brighter 996 nit display
- Snapdragon 695 may throttle under sustained load
- Less powerful CPU architecture compared to Exynos 1330
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G84 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 996 nits. This is a substantial advantage for outdoor visibility compared to the Galaxy F14, whose brightness is not specified. While the F14’s panel technology isn’t detailed, the G84’s high peak brightness suggests a superior viewing experience in direct sunlight. The absence of refresh rate information for both devices makes it difficult to assess smoothness, but the G84’s brightness is a clear win for users who spend significant time outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature a 'Photo / Video' camera setup, but lack specific details regarding sensor size or image processing capabilities. Without this information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the market segment suggests both will rely heavily on software processing to enhance image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is likely a marketing feature with limited practical utility. The absence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) details suggests both phones will struggle in low-light conditions without a stable hand or tripod.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy F14’s Exynos 1330 (5nm) and the Motorola Moto G84’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm) represent different approaches to mobile processing. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1330 generally translates to better power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 6nm Snapdragon 695. While the Snapdragon 695 has a slightly higher clock speed on its prime cores (2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz), the Exynos 1330’s Cortex-A78 cores offer a more substantial architectural advantage, leading to better sustained performance in demanding applications. The F14 is likely to exhibit less throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G84 shines in battery performance, achieving an impressive active use score of 12:31h and an endurance rating of 117h. This indicates exceptional longevity, allowing for multi-day use for many users. The Galaxy F14’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 25W charging is slower than the Moto G84’s 30W charging. While faster charging is convenient, the Moto G84’s superior endurance mitigates the need for frequent top-ups, making it the more practical choice for users prioritizing battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F14 if you need a phone capable of handling moderately demanding tasks and appreciate the Samsung ecosystem. Its Exynos 1330 provides a performance boost for multitasking and light gaming. Buy the Motorola Moto G84 if you prioritize all-day battery life and a clean, near-stock Android experience. The Moto G84 excels in endurance, making it ideal for users who are frequently away from a power source.