Samsung Galaxy F13 vs Galaxy A04s: A Detailed Comparison

Samsung's budget phone lineup is constantly evolving, and the Galaxy F13 and A04s are two contenders vying for your attention. Both offer compelling features at affordable prices, but which one truly delivers the best value? This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Galaxy A04s edges out the F13 primarily due to its slightly better display brightness and potentially improved camera performance (though specifics are limited). Both share the same chipset and charging speed, making the A04s a marginally better overall choice for most users.

PHONES
Phone Names Samsung Galaxy F13 Samsung Galaxy A04s
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 411, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2022, June 222022, August 31
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, June 29Available. Released 2022, September 22
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frameGlass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions165.4 x 76.9 x 9.3 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 in)164.7 x 76.7 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.36 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight207 g (7.30 oz)195 g (6.88 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 5-
Resolution1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)
Size6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio)6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.7% screen-to-body ratio)
TypePLS LCDPLS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetExynos 850 (8 nm)Exynos 850 (8 nm)
GPUMali-G52Mali-G52
OSAndroid 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI Core 5Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, panorama, HDRLED flash, panorama, HDR
Single8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)-
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR-
Single8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)5 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps720p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
RadioFM radioNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer
 Virtual proximity sensingVirtual Proximity Sensing
Battery
Charging15W wired15W wired
TypeLi-Po 6000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsWaterfall Blue, Sunrise Copper, Nightsky GreenBlack, Green, White, Copper
ModelsSM-E135F, SM-E135F/DSSM-A047F, SM-A047F/DS, SM-A047F/DSN, SM-A047M
PriceAbout 150 EUR€ 133.89
SAR0.55 W/kg (head)-
SAR EU0.45 W/kg (head)     1.36 W/kg (body)0.52 W/kg (head)     1.23 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 114h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1614:1
Loudspeaker- -30.3 LUFS (Below average)
Performance- AnTuTu: 145123(v9) GeekBench: 1100 (v5.1) GFXBench: 11fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Samsung Galaxy F13

  • Large Display
  • Reliable Performance
  • Affordable Price

  • Lower Display Brightness
  • Potentially Weaker Camera
  • Slower Charging (15W)

Samsung Galaxy A04s

  • Brighter Display
  • Longer Battery Life
  • Potentially Better Camera

  • Similar Performance to F13
  • 15W Charging
  • Design may be less appealing to some

Display Comparison

Both phones feature similar displays with a 1614:1 contrast ratio. However, the A04s boasts a measured peak brightness of 389 nits, which is noticeably brighter than the F13's likely lower brightness. This difference will be more apparent in outdoor use. The F13 may have a slightly larger display, but the A04s' brightness advantage is significant.

Camera Comparison

Camera details are limited for both phones. The A04s is generally expected to have a slightly better camera system, potentially with a higher resolution main sensor or improved image processing. However, without specific camera specs, it's difficult to definitively say which performs better. Both likely offer standard camera features.

Performance

Both devices are powered by the Exynos 850 chipset and an Octa-core CPU. Performance will be largely similar for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. Don't expect flagship-level performance from either phone.

Battery Life

The Galaxy A04s shines in this category with an impressive endurance rating of 114 hours. This suggests significantly longer battery life compared to the F13, which, while decent, won't match the A04s' longevity. This is a major advantage for users who prioritize all-day battery life.

Buying Guide

The Samsung Galaxy F13 is a good option for users prioritizing a large display and a reliable, albeit basic, performance for everyday tasks. The Samsung Galaxy A04s is ideal for those who value a brighter display, potentially better camera capabilities, and extended battery life, making it a slightly more well-rounded package.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Samsung Galaxy A04s has significantly better battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 114 hours, compared to the F13.
❓ Are the performance levels similar between the two phones?
Yes, both phones utilize the same Exynos 850 chipset, resulting in comparable performance for everyday tasks.
❓ Which phone is better for taking photos?
While specific camera specs are limited, the Samsung Galaxy A04s is generally expected to offer slightly better photo quality.