Samsung's budget phone lineup is constantly evolving, and the Galaxy F13 and A04s are two contenders vying for your attention. Both offer compelling features at affordable prices, but which one truly delivers the best value? This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Galaxy A04s edges out the F13 primarily due to its slightly better display brightness and potentially improved camera performance (though specifics are limited). Both share the same chipset and charging speed, making the A04s a marginally better overall choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 22 | 2022, August 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 29 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.4 x 76.9 x 9.3 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 in) | 164.7 x 76.7 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | PLS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) | Exynos 850 (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 | Mali-G52 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI Core 5 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Waterfall Blue, Sunrise Copper, Nightsky Green | Black, Green, White, Copper |
| Models | SM-E135F, SM-E135F/DS | SM-A047F, SM-A047F/DS, SM-A047F/DSN, SM-A047M |
| Price | About 150 EUR | € 133.89 |
| SAR | 0.55 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.45 W/kg (head) 1.36 W/kg (body) | 0.52 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 114h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1614:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.3 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 145123(v9)
GeekBench: 1100 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 11fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy F13
- Large Display
- Reliable Performance
- Affordable Price
- Lower Display Brightness
- Potentially Weaker Camera
- Slower Charging (15W)
Samsung Galaxy A04s
- Brighter Display
- Longer Battery Life
- Potentially Better Camera
- Similar Performance to F13
- 15W Charging
- Design may be less appealing to some
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar displays with a 1614:1 contrast ratio. However, the A04s boasts a measured peak brightness of 389 nits, which is noticeably brighter than the F13's likely lower brightness. This difference will be more apparent in outdoor use. The F13 may have a slightly larger display, but the A04s' brightness advantage is significant.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited for both phones. The A04s is generally expected to have a slightly better camera system, potentially with a higher resolution main sensor or improved image processing. However, without specific camera specs, it's difficult to definitively say which performs better. Both likely offer standard camera features.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Exynos 850 chipset and an Octa-core CPU. Performance will be largely similar for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. Don't expect flagship-level performance from either phone.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A04s shines in this category with an impressive endurance rating of 114 hours. This suggests significantly longer battery life compared to the F13, which, while decent, won't match the A04s' longevity. This is a major advantage for users who prioritize all-day battery life.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy F13 is a good option for users prioritizing a large display and a reliable, albeit basic, performance for everyday tasks. The Samsung Galaxy A04s is ideal for those who value a brighter display, potentially better camera capabilities, and extended battery life, making it a slightly more well-rounded package.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Samsung Galaxy A04s has significantly better battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 114 hours, compared to the F13.
❓ Are the performance levels similar between the two phones?
Yes, both phones utilize the same Exynos 850 chipset, resulting in comparable performance for everyday tasks.
❓ Which phone is better for taking photos?
While specific camera specs are limited, the Samsung Galaxy A04s is generally expected to offer slightly better photo quality.