The Samsung Galaxy F13 and Realme Narzo 50i Prime represent two distinct approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The F13 leverages Samsung’s in-house Exynos 850 chipset, while the Narzo 50i Prime opts for the Unisoc Tiger T612. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best experience for the price-conscious consumer.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy F13 emerges as the better choice. Its Exynos 850, built on a more efficient 8nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage and potentially better thermal management compared to the Narzo 50i Prime’s 12nm Unisoc T612. While the Narzo 50i Prime offers reverse wired charging, the F13’s overall package is more compelling.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 22 | 2022, June 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 29 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.4 x 76.9 x 9.3 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 in) | 164.1 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 850 (8 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 | Mali-G57 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI Core 5 | Android 11, Realme UI Go |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass | Accelerometer, proximity |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 10W wired
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Waterfall Blue, Sunrise Copper, Nightsky Green | Dark Blue, Mint Green |
| Models | SM-E135F, SM-E135F/DS | RMX3506 |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | 0.55 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.45 W/kg (head) 1.36 W/kg (body) | - |
Samsung Galaxy F13
- More efficient 8nm Exynos 850 chipset
- Faster 15W wired charging
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Lacks reverse wired charging
- Camera specs are unknown
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
- Reverse wired charging for accessories
- Potentially lower price point
- big.LITTLE architecture for burst performance
- Less efficient 12nm Unisoc Tiger T612 chipset
- Slower 10W wired charging
- Potentially more thermal throttling
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. However, the lack of detailed display specs necessitates a focus on processing power to drive the UI smoothly. The F13’s Exynos 850 may offer a slight edge in rendering animations and transitions, but the difference will be minimal without knowing the refresh rates or resolutions of each display.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the presence of multiple sensors, a direct comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature a primary camera accompanied by depth and macro sensors. The usefulness of the 2MP macro sensors on both devices is questionable. The image signal processor (ISP) within the Exynos 850 may offer slightly better image processing capabilities, but the quality will ultimately depend on the primary sensor resolution and lens aperture – information not provided.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy F13’s Exynos 850 (8nm) features a homogenous octa-core configuration with all cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. The Realme Narzo 50i Prime’s Unisoc Tiger T612 (12nm) employs a big.LITTLE architecture with 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. While the Narzo 50i Prime’s A75 cores offer higher peak performance, the Exynos 850’s more efficient 8nm process and consistent core speeds likely translate to better sustained performance and potentially lower temperatures during prolonged use. The 12nm process of the Unisoc chip will consume more power for the same level of performance.
Battery Life
The Realme Narzo 50i Prime’s 10W charging is significantly slower than the Samsung Galaxy F13’s 15W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the more efficient Exynos 850 in the F13 could offset a potentially smaller battery size. The Narzo 50i Prime’s reverse wired charging is a unique feature, allowing it to act as a power bank for accessories, but this convenience comes at the cost of slower overall charging speeds.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F13 if you prioritize consistent performance for everyday tasks, occasional gaming, and a potentially smoother software experience. Its 8nm Exynos chip offers a more future-proof foundation. Buy the Realme Narzo 50i Prime if your primary need is a very basic smartphone for calls, texts, and light social media, and you value the convenience of reverse wired charging to top up accessories.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 850 in the Galaxy F13 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Exynos 850, built on an 8nm process, is generally more thermally efficient than the Unisoc T612. While it won't match flagship-level cooling, it's less likely to experience significant throttling during moderate gaming compared to the Narzo 50i Prime.
❓ Is the reverse wired charging on the Narzo 50i Prime useful for more than just earbuds?
Yes, the reverse wired charging can be used to top up other devices like smartwatches, fitness trackers, or even another smartphone, albeit at a slower rate than a dedicated charger. It's a niche feature, but valuable for users who frequently travel or find themselves without access to power outlets.
❓ How does the Unisoc T612 handle multitasking compared to the Exynos 850?
The Exynos 850’s consistent octa-core configuration is likely to provide a smoother multitasking experience than the Unisoc T612. While the T612’s A75 cores offer peak performance, the Exynos 850’s sustained performance and efficient architecture will be more noticeable when switching between multiple apps.
