Samsung Galaxy F07 vs. Xiaomi Redmi 9A Sport: A Detailed Performance and Value Showdown

The Samsung Galaxy F07 and Xiaomi Redmi 9A Sport represent two compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone segment. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price, they diverge significantly in their core hardware. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on the impact of the Mediatek Helio G99 in the F07 versus the Helio G25 in the 9A Sport, and how those choices translate to real-world user experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users prioritizing performance and faster charging, the Samsung Galaxy F07 is the clear winner. Its Helio G99 chipset offers a substantial performance uplift over the Redmi 9A Sport’s Helio G25, and the 25W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Redmi 9A Sport remains a viable option for those on the tightest budgets.

PHONES
Phone Names Samsung Galaxy F07 Xiaomi Redmi 9A Sport
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 411, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2025, October 042021, September 28
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, October 04Available. Released 2021, September 28
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frame-
Dimensions167.4 x 77.4 x 7.6 mm (6.59 x 3.05 x 0.30 in)164.9 x 77.1 x 9 mm (6.49 x 3.04 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight184 g (6.49 oz)194 g (6.84 oz)
 -Water-repellent coating
Display
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)
Size6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio)6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio)
TypePLS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD, 400 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53)
ChipsetMediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MC2PowerVR GE8320
OSAndroid 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7Android 10, MIUI 12
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens-
FeaturesLED flashLED flash, HDR
Single-13 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fps
Selfie camera
Features-HDR
Single8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm5 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm
VideoYes1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, BDS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBUSB Type-C 2.0microUSB 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximityAccelerometer, proximity
Battery
Charging25W wired10W wired
Type5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsGreenCarbon Black, Coral Green, Metallic Blue
ModelsSM-E075F/DS, SM-E075F-
Price₹ 7,455About 100 EUR
SAR0.24 W/kg (head)-

Samsung Galaxy F07

  • Significantly faster processor (Helio G99)
  • 25W fast charging for reduced downtime
  • More efficient 6nm process node

  • Likely higher price point
  • May not have a significantly better display

Xiaomi Redmi 9A Sport

  • Lower price point
  • Functional for basic smartphone tasks
  • Acceptable battery life for light usage

  • Slow processor (Helio G25)
  • Slow 10W charging
  • Limited performance for gaming and multitasking

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a particularly impressive display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are unavailable, the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The Helio G99 in the F07 has a more capable GPU, potentially enabling smoother animations and a more responsive touch experience, even if the panel itself is similar. Bezels are likely comparable given the price points, and both will likely utilize LCD technology.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Helio G99’s image signal processor (ISP) is more advanced, offering better noise reduction, dynamic range, and potentially faster image processing. While both phones likely feature a primary camera and a suite of lower-resolution sensors (often including a 2MP macro), the F07 will likely produce superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Redmi 9A Sport’s camera will be functional for basic snapshots, but will lack the refinement of the F07.

Performance

The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Samsung Galaxy F07’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) utilizes a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A76 cores – compared to the Redmi 9A Sport’s Helio G25 (12nm) which relies on older Cortex-A53 cores. The G99’s architecture delivers substantially higher single-core and multi-core performance. The 6nm process node further enhances efficiency, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance under load. The Redmi 9A Sport’s G25, while adequate for basic tasks, will struggle with demanding applications and multitasking. The G99’s GPU is also significantly more powerful, making the F07 the better choice for mobile gaming.

Battery Life

While battery capacity isn’t specified, the real-world impact is heavily influenced by charging speed. The Samsung Galaxy F07’s 25W wired charging is a game-changer in this segment, allowing for a significantly faster 0-100% charge time compared to the Redmi 9A Sport’s 10W charging. Even if the Redmi 9A Sport has a slightly larger battery, the F07’s faster charging will minimize downtime. The Helio G99’s 6nm process also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting any capacity difference.

Buying Guide

Buy the Samsung Galaxy F07 if you need a phone capable of handling moderate gaming, multitasking, and appreciate significantly faster charging speeds. This is the better choice for users who value responsiveness and future-proofing, even within the budget category. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi 9A Sport if you prioritize absolute affordability and primarily need a phone for basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media use. It’s a functional device for those with minimal smartphone demands.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Redmi 9A Sport struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
While the Redmi 9A Sport can run WhatsApp and Facebook, you may experience noticeable lag and slowdowns when multitasking or using these apps extensively. The Helio G25 is designed for basic tasks, and these apps can be resource-intensive.
❓ Is the 25W charging on the Samsung Galaxy F07 compatible with any USB-C charger, or do I need a specific Samsung charger?
The Samsung Galaxy F07 supports the USB Power Delivery (USB-PD) standard. While a Samsung charger is recommended for optimal performance, any USB-C charger that supports USB-PD and delivers at least 25W will work, though charging speeds may vary.
❓ Can I play PUBG Mobile on either of these phones?
PUBG Mobile is playable on both, but the experience will differ drastically. The Redmi 9A Sport will require the lowest possible graphics settings and will likely still experience significant frame drops. The Samsung Galaxy F07, with its Helio G99, can handle PUBG Mobile at medium settings with a more stable frame rate.
❓ How much does the difference in processor speed translate to everyday tasks like browsing and opening apps?
The difference is quite noticeable. On the Redmi 9A Sport, opening apps and switching between them will feel sluggish. The Samsung Galaxy F07 will offer a much smoother and more responsive experience, making everyday tasks feel significantly faster.