Samsung's A and F series cater to the budget-conscious consumer, but within that segment, significant differences exist. The Galaxy F07, featuring the Mediatek Helio G99, aims for a balance of performance and efficiency, while the A04e, with the Helio P35, prioritizes affordability. This comparison dissects these two devices to determine which offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy F07 is the superior choice. Its Helio G99 chipset delivers significantly better performance, making it more responsive for everyday tasks and capable of handling moderate gaming. While the A04e is cheaper, the performance gap justifies the price premium for those who value a smoother user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 04 | 2022, October 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 04 | Available. Released 2022, November 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 77.4 x 7.6 mm (6.59 x 3.05 x 0.30 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | - | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | - |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green | Black, Copper, Light Blue |
| Models | SM-E075F/DS, SM-E075F | SM-A042F, SM-A042F/DS, SM-A042M, SM-A042M/DS |
| Price | ₹ 7,455 | ₹ 7,999 |
| SAR | 0.24 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.29 W/kg (head) 1.11 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy F07
- Significantly faster processor (Helio G99)
- More efficient 6nm process for better battery life
- Faster 25W charging support
- Likely higher price point
- May not have significant camera improvements without further specs
Samsung Galaxy A04e
- Lower price point
- Adequate for basic smartphone tasks
- Potentially longer standby time due to less powerful processor
- Noticeably slower performance
- Less efficient 12nm process
- Slower charging speeds
Display Comparison
Both devices likely feature LCD panels, a common trait in this price bracket. However, the comparison stops there as detailed display specs are unavailable. The F07's target market suggests a slightly higher quality panel is probable, but without nits or color gamut data, it's speculative. Bezels are expected to be similar, reflecting the budget nature of both phones. The absence of high refresh rates on either device is standard for this segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and potentially depth/macro sensors. However, the Helio G99’s integrated image signal processor (ISP) in the F07 is more advanced, enabling better image processing, noise reduction, and potentially faster autofocus. The A04e’s P35 ISP will be more limited in its capabilities. The F07 is likely to produce more detailed and vibrant photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Galaxy F07’s Mediatek Helio G99, built on a 6nm process, offers a substantial advantage over the A04e’s Helio P35 (12nm). The G99’s CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – is architecturally superior to the P35’s 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53. The Cortex-A76 cores in the F07 provide a significant performance boost in single-core tasks, while the more efficient 6nm node translates to better thermal management and potentially longer sustained performance. The P35, while adequate for basic tasks, will struggle with demanding applications and multitasking.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Helio G99’s 6nm process efficiency in the F07 will contribute to better battery life compared to the A04e’s 12nm Helio P35, even with a similar battery capacity. The F07 also supports 25W wired charging, a significant advantage over the A04e, which likely supports a slower charging rate. This translates to considerably faster charging times for the F07, minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F07 if you need a phone that can handle multitasking, social media, and casual gaming without significant lag. It's ideal for users who want a responsive experience and aren't willing to compromise on performance. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A04e if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light web browsing – and you prioritize the absolute lowest price point over performance and future-proofing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P35 in the A04e struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
While the Helio P35 can run these apps, you may experience noticeable lag and slower loading times, especially with multiple apps open simultaneously. The A04e is best suited for light usage and single-app operation.
❓ Is the 25W charging on the F07 a significant improvement over the A04e's likely 10W or 15W charging?
Yes, it is. 25W charging will significantly reduce the time it takes to fully charge the F07, potentially cutting charging times in half compared to the A04e. This is a major convenience factor for users who rely heavily on their phones throughout the day.
❓ Can the Galaxy F07 handle basic mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Helio G99 in the F07 can handle these games at lower settings. Expect playable frame rates with reduced graphics quality. The A04e's Helio P35 will struggle significantly with these titles, likely resulting in a poor gaming experience.
❓ Does the difference in chipset translate to a noticeable difference in app opening speeds?
Absolutely. The F07's Helio G99 will open apps much faster than the A04e's Helio P35 due to its more powerful CPU cores and improved architecture. This difference will be particularly noticeable with larger, more complex apps.
