The Samsung Galaxy F07 and A03s represent Samsung's approach to the ultra-budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at a low price, they diverge significantly in their internal hardware. The F07, with its newer Mediatek Helio G99 chipset, promises a substantial performance uplift, but at what cost to battery life and overall value? This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy F07 is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Helio G99 chipset delivers significantly faster performance, making it more responsive for everyday tasks and capable of handling light gaming. While both phones offer similar battery endurance ratings, the F07’s 25W charging is a considerable advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 - SM-A037U |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 04 | 2021, August 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 04 | Available. Released 2021, August 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 77.4 x 7.6 mm (6.59 x 3.05 x 0.30 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 Core |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | - | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | SM-E075F/DS, SM-E075F | SM-A037F, SM-A037F/DS, SM-A037M, SM-A037G, SM-A037U, SM-S134DL, SM-A037W, SM-A037U1, SM-S135DL |
| Price | ₹ 7,455 | $ 65.65 / £ 82.99 / ₹ 10,800 |
| SAR | 0.24 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.36 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 122h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1718:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 103465 (v8), 101299 (v9)
GeekBench: 889 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 5.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy F07
- Significantly faster processor for smoother performance
- Faster 25W charging for quicker top-ups
- More efficient 6nm chipset for better thermal management
- Peak brightness data unavailable, potentially less visible in sunlight
- Camera specs are not detailed
Samsung Galaxy A03s
- Measured peak brightness of 488 nits for good outdoor visibility
- Lower initial cost
- Comparable battery endurance rating
- Slow Helio P35 processor struggles with demanding tasks
- Slower 15W charging
- Less efficient 12nm chipset
Display Comparison
Both the Galaxy F07 and A03s share a contrast ratio of 1718:1, suggesting similar image quality in terms of black levels and color depth. However, the A03s boasts a measured peak brightness of 488 nits, a figure not available for the F07. This suggests the A03s may be more visible in direct sunlight. The lack of information regarding panel technology (IPS, TFT) for either device makes a detailed comparison of color accuracy difficult, but given the price point, expectations should be tempered. The absence of high refresh rate support on both models indicates a focus on power efficiency over visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a 'Photo / Video' camera setup, but lack specific details regarding sensor resolution or features. Without this information, a direct comparison is limited. It’s reasonable to assume both devices will offer adequate image quality for casual snapshots in good lighting conditions. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the A03s is unlikely to provide a significant benefit due to its low resolution and limited dynamic range. The F07’s more powerful processor *could* translate to better image processing capabilities, but this remains speculative without further details.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Galaxy F07’s Mediatek Helio G99, built on a 6nm process, is a significant upgrade over the A03s’ Helio P35 (12nm). The G99’s octa-core CPU, featuring two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, provides a much more powerful architecture than the P35’s configuration of four Cortex-A53 cores at 2.35 GHz and four more at 1.8 GHz. The A76 cores in the F07 offer a considerable IPC (Instructions Per Clock) advantage, resulting in faster app loading times and smoother multitasking. The 6nm fabrication process also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. This translates to a noticeably snappier user experience on the F07.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both the Galaxy F07 and A03s achieve an endurance rating of 122 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the F07’s 25W wired charging is a major advantage over the A03s’ 15W charging. This means the F07 can replenish its battery significantly faster, reducing downtime and offering greater convenience. While the battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging speed of the F07 effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F07 if you prioritize performance and responsiveness, frequently use demanding apps, or enjoy mobile gaming. The faster processor and charging will significantly improve your experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A03s if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and you value a slightly lower initial cost. It’s a functional device for those with minimal smartphone requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Galaxy F07 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Helio G99 in the Galaxy F07 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The A03s’ Helio P35 would struggle significantly, resulting in a choppy and unenjoyable gaming experience.
❓ Is the 25W charging on the F07 a significant improvement over the A03s' 15W charging?
Yes, the 25W charging on the F07 will noticeably reduce charging times. Expect a full charge in approximately 1 hour 30 minutes, compared to over 2 hours for the A03s. This is a substantial convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Does the Galaxy A03s have enough processing power for basic social media and messaging apps?
The Galaxy A03s is sufficient for basic tasks like browsing social media, sending messages, and making calls. However, expect some lag and slowdown when multitasking or opening multiple apps simultaneously.
❓ What type of storage does each phone use, and is it expandable?
While not specified in the provided data, Samsung's budget phones typically utilize eMMC storage. Both devices likely support microSD card expansion for additional storage, but the maximum supported capacity may vary.
