The Samsung Galaxy F07 and Motorola Moto E40 represent two approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The F07, leveraging Mediatek's Helio G99, aims for a performance edge, while the Moto E40 focuses on providing a functional experience at an even lower price point with the Unisoc T700. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy F07 is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Helio G99 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Motorola Moto E40’s Unisoc T700, making it better suited for gaming and demanding applications. While the Moto E40 is cheaper, the F07’s faster charging and processing power justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 40, 66 - Brazil |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 04 | 2021, October 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 04 | Available. Released 2021, October 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 77.4 x 7.6 mm (6.59 x 3.05 x 0.30 in) | 165.1 x 75.7 x 9.1 mm (6.5 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core 1.8 GHz |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Unisoc T700 |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali G52 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green | Carbon Gray, Pink Clay |
| Models | SM-E075F/DS, SM-E075F | - |
| Price | ₹ 7,455 | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | 0.24 W/kg (head) | - |
Samsung Galaxy F07
- Significantly faster processor (Helio G99)
- Faster 25W charging
- Likely better image processing
- Potentially higher price
- May not have a significantly better display
Motorola Moto E40
- Lower price point
- Functional for basic tasks
- Potentially longer battery life (depending on capacity)
- Slow processor (Unisoc T700)
- Slow 10W charging
- Limited performance for gaming or multitasking
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the F07’s positioning, it likely features a higher resolution panel than the E40. The E40, being a more budget-focused device, may utilize a lower-quality panel with narrower viewing angles. Color accuracy is also likely to be superior on the F07, assuming Samsung’s typical display calibration practices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the F07’s likely higher processing power allows for more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The Unisoc T700 in the E40 may struggle with complex image processing tasks. It’s reasonable to assume the F07 will offer a more refined camera experience, even if the sensor resolutions are similar. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and offers limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy F07’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) is a significantly more powerful processor than the Motorola Moto E40’s Unisoc T700. The G99’s octa-core configuration, featuring two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, provides a substantial advantage in single-core and multi-core performance. The Unisoc T700’s 1.8 GHz octa-core CPU is geared towards efficiency rather than raw speed. The 6nm process node of the Helio G99 also contributes to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads, benefiting gamers and power users. This translates to smoother app launches, faster multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the F07.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but the charging speeds are a key differentiator. The Samsung Galaxy F07’s 25W wired charging is significantly faster than the Motorola Moto E40’s 10W charging. This means the F07 can replenish its battery much more quickly, reducing downtime. Even if the E40 has a slightly larger battery capacity, the F07’s faster charging will likely result in a more convenient user experience. A full charge on the E40 could take over two hours, while the F07 could achieve a full charge in under 90 minutes.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F07 if you prioritize performance for gaming, streaming, or multitasking and value faster 25W charging. This phone is ideal for users who want a responsive experience without breaking the bank. Buy the Motorola Moto E40 if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and you are on an extremely tight budget. It’s a functional device for those who prioritize affordability above all else.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T700 in the Moto E40 struggle with popular apps like Facebook or Instagram?
While the Unisoc T700 can handle basic apps like Facebook and Instagram, you may experience occasional lag or slowdowns, especially when multitasking or using the apps for extended periods. The processor is designed for efficiency, not high performance.
❓ How much faster is the 25W charging on the Samsung Galaxy F07 compared to the 10W charging on the Moto E40?
The 25W charging on the F07 is more than twice as fast as the 10W charging on the E40. This translates to a significantly shorter charging time – potentially under 90 minutes for a full charge on the F07, compared to over two hours for the E40.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy F07 a good choice for playing mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Helio G99 in the F07 is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. However, don't expect a flagship-level gaming experience. The Unisoc T700 in the Moto E40 will struggle with these titles.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto E40 support software updates and security patches?
Motorola's software update policy for the Moto E40 is limited. While it will likely receive some security patches, major Android version updates are unlikely. Samsung generally provides more consistent software support for its devices, including the F07.
