Samsung's 5G lineup can be confusing, especially in the budget segment. The Galaxy F06 5G and A23 5G both aim to deliver affordable 5G connectivity, but they take different approaches. The F06 5G features a newer Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset, while the A23 5G relies on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy F06 5G emerges as the better choice. Its newer Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Snapdragon 695 in the A23 5G, making it more responsive for everyday tasks and light gaming. While both offer similar battery life and charging speeds, the F06's processing advantage justifies the slight price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 2, 5, 30, 66, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 12 | 2022, August 05 |
| Status | Available. Released February 20 | Available. Released 2022, September 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 77.4 x 8 mm (6.59 x 3.05 x 0.31 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 800 nits (HBM) | PLS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI Core 7.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - USA
8 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - International |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Bahama Blue, Lit Violet | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | SM-E066B, SM-E066B/DS | SM-A236U, SM-A236U1, SM-A236B, SM-A236B/DS, SM-A236B/DSN, SM-A236E, SM-S236DL |
| Price | ₹ 8,727 | $ 84.44 / £ 129.00 / € 125.28 / ₹ 21,000 |
| SAR | 1.05 W/kg (head) | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.57 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | 1.30 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) | 1.49 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 138h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1328:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318821 (v9)
GeekBench: 1940 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Samsung Galaxy F06 5G
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Potentially better power efficiency
- Likely smoother multitasking experience
- Display specs are less detailed than the A23 5G
- Camera specs are currently unknown
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
- Measured display brightness available
- Established Snapdragon 695 performance profile
- Potentially lower price point
- Older chipset with less processing power
- Less efficient CPU architecture
- May struggle with demanding applications
Display Comparison
Both the Galaxy F06 5G and A23 5G share a similar display profile, boasting a 1328:1 contrast ratio. However, the A23 5G’s measured peak brightness of 508 nits provides a slightly more visible experience in direct sunlight. While neither phone is expected to feature high refresh rate panels, the comparable contrast ratios suggest similar viewing angles and black levels. The lack of detailed display specs for the F06 5G means we can't assess potential improvements in color accuracy or panel technology.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Given their price points, expect similar camera performance. The A23 5G’s camera system likely features a larger main sensor, but without knowing the megapixel count or aperture, it’s difficult to assess the difference in image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing feature, offering limited practical benefit. Image processing will likely be similar, leaning towards Samsung’s typically vibrant and saturated style.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Galaxy F06 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) utilizes a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz – compared to the A23 5G’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm) with its 2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores. This translates to a roughly 10-15% performance advantage for the F06 5G in CPU-intensive tasks. The Dimensity 6300’s newer process node and core design also suggest improved power efficiency. While both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, the F06 5G’s superior processing power will result in snappier app launches and smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
Both the Galaxy F06 5G and A23 5G achieve an endurance rating of 138 hours, indicating comparable battery life. Both support 25W wired charging, suggesting similar 0-100% charging times – approximately 1 hour and 30 minutes. The Dimensity 6300’s potentially better power efficiency in the F06 5G might slightly offset the identical battery capacity, leading to marginally longer real-world usage, but the difference will be minimal.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F06 5G if you prioritize smooth performance for social media, streaming, and casual gaming. Its newer chipset ensures a more future-proof experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G if you find a significantly lower price and are primarily focused on basic smartphone functions like calls, texts, and occasional photo capture, and aren't concerned with demanding applications.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 in the F06 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Dimensity 6300 isn't a gaming powerhouse, it should be capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The improved CPU and GPU performance compared to the Snapdragon 695 in the A23 5G will provide a smoother experience, but don't expect to max out the graphics settings.
❓ Is the 25W charging on either phone fast enough for quick top-ups throughout the day?
25W charging is adequate for these price points, but it's not exceptionally fast. Expect a full charge to take around 1 hour and 30 minutes. However, a 15-30 minute charge will provide a noticeable boost in battery life for short top-ups.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G have any features the F06 5G lacks?
Currently, there's no publicly available information suggesting any exclusive features on the A23 5G. The F06 5G's newer chipset is the key differentiator, and the A23 5G's advantage lies primarily in potentially lower pricing.
