Google Pixel 7a vs Samsung Galaxy F06 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its Tensor G2 chipset and exceptional camera system offer a significantly better user experience, despite the slower 18W charging. The Galaxy F06 5G is a viable option for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing 5G connectivity and a larger display.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Samsung Galaxy F06 5G | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, February 12 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released February 20 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 77.4 x 8 mm (6.59 x 3.05 x 0.31 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD, 800 nits (HBM) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI Core 7.0 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 25W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Bahama Blue, Lit Violet | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | SM-E066B, SM-E066B/DS | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | ₹ 8,727 | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
| SAR | 1.05 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.30 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) | - |
Samsung Galaxy F06 5G
- Superior camera performance with Google’s computational photography.
- Faster and more efficient Google Tensor G2 chipset.
- Guaranteed software updates and a clean Android experience.
- Slower 18W charging compared to the F06 5G.
- Higher price point than the Galaxy F06 5G.
Google Pixel 7a
- More affordable price point.
- Faster 25W wired charging.
- Potentially larger display size (unconfirmed).
- Less powerful Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset.
- Inferior camera performance compared to the Pixel 7a.
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1070 nits, compared to an assumed lower brightness on the F06 5G (typical of its price bracket). While the F06 5G’s panel size isn’t specified, the Pixel 7a’s 6.1-inch OLED offers vibrant colors and excellent viewing angles. The Pixel 7a’s display is likely to be more visible outdoors under direct sunlight due to its higher peak brightness. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is its standout feature. While specific sensor details are missing for both, Google’s computational photography algorithms, powered by the Tensor G2, elevate image quality significantly. The Pixel 7a excels in low-light photography and dynamic range. The F06 5G likely relies more on hardware and less on software processing, resulting in less refined images. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also expected to be superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s image signal processor. Ignoring the likely low-resolution macro lens on the F06 5G, the Pixel 7a’s overall camera experience is in a different league.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, fabricated on a 5nm process, offers a substantial performance advantage over the Samsung Galaxy F06 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The Tensor G2’s CPU configuration – 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 – is architecturally superior to the F06 5G’s 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience on the Pixel 7a. The 5nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While the F06 5G is adequate for everyday tasks, the Pixel 7a is the clear winner for demanding users.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, suggesting efficient power management despite its 18W wired and 7.5W wireless charging. The Galaxy F06 5G offers faster 25W wired charging, potentially allowing for quicker top-ups. However, the Pixel 7a’s optimized software and efficient chipset likely offset the slower charging speed in real-world usage. The actual battery capacity of the F06 5G isn’t specified, but the Pixel 7a’s overall endurance rating indicates a competitive battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Samsung Galaxy F06 5G if you need a dependable 5G phone with a focus on affordability and aren't heavily invested in mobile photography. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize camera quality, a smooth software experience with guaranteed updates, and are willing to pay a premium for Google’s computational photography prowess.