Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Samsung Galaxy F04 and Xiaomi Redmi A2 are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one reigns supreme? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy F04 edges out the Redmi A2 thanks to its slightly faster chipset and quicker charging. However, the Redmi A2 might offer a more competitive price point, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers. Ultimately, the best choice depends on your priorities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 04 | 2023, March 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 12 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1 mm (6.49 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12, One UI | Android 12 or 13 (Go edition), MIUI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
0.08 MP (depth) |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Jade Purple, Opal Green | Aqua Blue, Classic Black, Sea Green |
| Models | SM-E045F, SM-E045F/DS | 23028RN4DG, 23026RN54G |
| Price | About 90 EUR | € 59.00 / £ 54.95 |
| SAR | 0.38 W/kg (head) | 1.10 W/kg (head) 1.01 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.90 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy F04
- Slightly faster chipset
- Faster 15W charging
- Potential for better portrait mode
- Samsung's One UI (generally well-regarded)
- May be slightly more expensive
- Entry-level camera performance
Xiaomi Redmi A2
- Likely more affordable
- Large battery for all-day use
- Reliable basic smartphone experience
- Slower 10W charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Basic camera performance
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a large 6.5-inch display, likely with a resolution around 720 x 1600 pixels. Expect decent viewing angles and color reproduction for everyday use, but don't anticipate flagship-level quality. The F04 might have a slightly brighter panel, but this is difficult to confirm without specific testing data.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy F04 likely boasts a dual-camera setup (13MP main + 2MP depth), while the Redmi A2 features a 8MP main camera. Image quality will be adequate in good lighting conditions, but expect noise and limited detail in low light. The F04's depth sensor might offer slightly better portrait mode capabilities.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy F04's Mediatek Helio P35 chipset offers a slight performance advantage over the Redmi A2's Helio G36. While both are entry-level processors, the P35's slightly higher clock speeds should translate to smoother multitasking and app loading times. Gaming performance will be basic on both devices.
Battery Life
Both phones are expected to have a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life for moderate usage. However, the Galaxy F04's 15W charging is faster than the Redmi A2's 10W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy F04 is ideal for users who prioritize a bit more performance and faster charging. The Xiaomi Redmi A2 is a great option for those seeking the absolute lowest price and a reliable, basic smartphone experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Samsung Galaxy F04 has a slightly more powerful chipset, so it will handle basic games better than the Redmi A2. However, neither phone is designed for demanding games.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Samsung generally provides better software updates and longer support for its devices compared to Xiaomi in this price range.
