Looking for a reliable smartphone without breaking the bank? The Samsung Galaxy F04 and Xiaomi Poco C55 are two contenders vying for the budget phone crown. Both offer attractive features, but which one truly delivers the best experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco C55 edges out the Galaxy F04 thanks to its superior chipset and slightly better performance. While both are budget options, the C55's Helio G85 provides a smoother experience for everyday tasks and light gaming. The F04 offers a familiar Samsung UI, but struggles to match the C55's overall value.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 04 | 2023, February 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 12 | Available. Released 2023, February 28 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Panda Glass), eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 168.8 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.65 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| | - | Dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Panda Glass |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1650 pixels (~268 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.71 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, One UI | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP (depth) |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Jade Purple, Opal Green | Cool Blue, Power Black, Forest Green |
| Models | SM-E045F, SM-E045F/DS | 22127PC95I |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 110 EUR |
| SAR | 0.38 W/kg (head) | 0.87 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy F04
- Familiar Samsung UI
- 15W Charging
- Decent Camera (in good light)
- Weaker Chipset
- Slower Performance
- 1080p display not confirmed
Xiaomi Poco C55
- More Powerful Chipset (Helio G85)
- Potentially Higher Refresh Rate Display
- Better Value for Money
- Slower 10W Charging
- Xiaomi's MIUI (can be polarizing)
- Design may be less premium
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large 6.5-inch displays, likely with HD+ resolution. Expect decent viewing angles and color reproduction for the price point, but don't anticipate flagship-level vibrancy. The Poco C55 might have a slightly higher refresh rate (potentially 90Hz) which would offer a smoother scrolling experience, though this is not confirmed.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy F04 likely features a triple camera setup with a primary sensor around 50MP, while the Poco C55 probably has a dual camera setup with a 50MP main sensor. Image quality will be decent in good lighting conditions for both, but low-light performance is likely to be average. The Poco C55's image processing might offer slightly more vibrant colors.
Performance
This is where the Poco C55 shines. The Helio G85 chipset is significantly more powerful than the Helio P35 in the Galaxy F04. Expect smoother app loading, better multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the C55. The F04 will handle basic tasks adequately, but may struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones are expected to have large batteries (likely around 5000mAh), providing all-day battery life for moderate users. However, the Poco C55's slower 10W charging means it will take longer to recharge compared to the F04's 15W charging.
Buying Guide
The Samsung Galaxy F04 is ideal for users deeply embedded in the Samsung ecosystem who prioritize a clean, familiar UI and basic functionality. The Xiaomi Poco C55 is a better choice for those seeking a bit more performance for the price, especially if they enjoy light gaming or multitasking.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Xiaomi Poco C55's Helio G85 chipset provides significantly better gaming performance compared to the Galaxy F04's Helio P35.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy F04 worth it if I prefer Samsung's software?
If you're heavily invested in the Samsung ecosystem and prefer their One UI, the Galaxy F04 might be a reasonable choice, but be aware of the performance limitations.
