Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Samsung Galaxy F04 and Xiaomi Poco C51 are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one reigns supreme? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy F04 edges out the Poco C51 thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset and faster charging. While both offer solid value, the F04 provides a marginally better overall experience for a similar price point, making it the preferred choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 04 | 2023, April 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 12 | Available. Released 2023, April 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 164.9 x 76.8 x 9.1 mm (6.49 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G36 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12, One UI | Android 13 (Go edition), MIUI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
0.08 MP (depth) |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Jade Purple, Opal Green | Power Black, Royal Blue |
| Models | SM-E045F, SM-E045F/DS | MZB0E6DIN, MZB0DXKIN, 2302EPCC4I, 2305EPCC4G, 2302EPCC4H |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 100 EUR |
| SAR | 0.38 W/kg (head) | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.87 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy F04
- Slightly more powerful chipset
- Faster 15W charging
- Samsung's One UI (potentially better software experience)
- Brand recognition and support
- May be slightly more expensive than the Poco C51
- Basic camera performance
- Plastic build quality
Xiaomi Poco C51
- Lower price point
- Large battery for all-day use
- Reliable and basic smartphone experience
- Xiaomi's MIUI (customizable software)
- Less powerful chipset
- Slower 10W charging
- Basic camera performance
- Potentially less software support in the long run
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large, LCD displays, likely around 6.5 inches. Expect similar resolutions (likely HD+). The Galaxy F04 might have slightly better color accuracy, but overall, display quality will be comparable. Viewing angles and brightness are likely average for this price range.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely similar, with a primary sensor around 13MP on both devices. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing. Expect decent daytime shots, but low-light performance will be limited. The F04 might have a slightly more refined camera app.
Performance
The Galaxy F04's Helio P35 chipset holds a slight advantage over the Poco C51's Helio G36. While both are entry-level chips, the P35 generally offers a bit more processing power, resulting in smoother multitasking and slightly faster app loading times. Gaming performance will be basic on both.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature a battery capacity around 5000mAh, offering all-day battery life with moderate usage. However, the Galaxy F04's 15W charging is faster than the Poco C51's 10W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy F04? Users prioritizing a bit more processing power and faster charging will appreciate the F04. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco C51? Those seeking the absolute lowest price and a reliable, basic smartphone experience will find the Poco C51 appealing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Samsung Galaxy F04 has a slightly more powerful chipset, making it marginally better for basic gaming. However, neither phone is designed for demanding games.
❓ How much storage do these phones offer?
Both phones typically come in configurations with 32GB or 64GB of internal storage, expandable via microSD card.
❓ What operating system do these phones run?
The Samsung Galaxy F04 runs Samsung's One UI based on Android, while the Xiaomi Poco C51 runs Xiaomi's MIUI based on Android. Both offer a customized user experience.
