Looking for an affordable Samsung smartphone? The Galaxy F04 and F13 are both contenders in the budget segment, offering a blend of features and value. But which one is right for you? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs, performance, and more.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy F13 emerges as the clear winner. While the F04 is a decent entry-level option, the F13's more efficient Exynos chipset, slightly better display, and overall smoother performance make it the superior choice for most users, despite similar charging speeds.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 04 | 2022, June 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 12 | Available. Released 2022, June 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 9.3 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | PLS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Exynos 850 (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 |
| OS | Android 12, One UI | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI Core 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Jade Purple, Opal Green | Waterfall Blue, Sunrise Copper, Nightsky Green |
| Models | SM-E045F, SM-E045F/DS | SM-E135F, SM-E135F/DS |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | 0.38 W/kg (head) | 0.55 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.45 W/kg (head) 1.36 W/kg (body) |
Samsung Galaxy F04
- Very affordable
- Large battery (6000mAh)
- Decent display for the price
- Slow performance
- Outdated chipset
- Basic camera capabilities
- Less future-proof
Samsung Galaxy F13
- Better performance (Exynos 850)
- Larger and potentially better display
- Improved camera processing
- More future-proof
- Slightly more expensive than F04
- 15W charging is slow
Display Comparison
The Galaxy F13 boasts a 6.6-inch FHD+ display, offering a larger and more immersive viewing experience compared to the F04's likely smaller display (estimated 6.5 inches). Both likely use LCD panels, but the F13's larger size and potentially slightly better color accuracy give it an edge.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature a triple-camera setup, with a primary sensor around 50MP. However, the F13's more powerful processor allows for better image processing and potentially improved low-light performance. Expect slightly more detailed and vibrant photos from the F13.
Performance
This is where the F13 shines. The Exynos 850 chipset, built on a more efficient 8nm process, significantly outperforms the F04's Mediatek Helio P35 (12nm). Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance on the F13. The F04 will feel noticeably slower.
Battery Life
Both phones are expected to have a large 6000mAh battery, providing excellent all-day battery life. While charging speeds are identical at 15W, the F13's more efficient chipset might translate to slightly better real-world battery endurance.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy F04? Those on the absolute tightest budget who prioritize basic functionality and a smaller form factor. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy F13? Anyone seeking a more responsive and future-proof budget phone with a better processor and slightly improved features.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy F04 good for gaming?
The F04's Helio P35 chipset struggles with demanding games. While basic games might be playable, expect lag and low frame rates. The F13 is a much better choice for gaming.
❓ What is the difference between the F04 and F13 cameras?
While both have similar primary sensors, the F13's Exynos 850 processor allows for better image processing, resulting in sharper, more detailed photos, especially in low light.
